Sensor-Guided Depalletising Head for Damage-Free Layer Sliding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing depalletising systems risk damaging containers or interposed sheets due to confinement walls during the lifting process, leading to inefficiencies and potential damage.

Innovation Solution

A depalletising system with a removal head using suction and sliding, combined with a movable unloading support and sensor-guided positioning, allows precise layer removal without confinement walls, adapting to misalignments and compensating for uneven surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If confinement walls are used to position the stack of layers, then the stack remains arranged according to a predefined position, but the containers, layers, or interlayer sheets may be hit, damaged, or moved during lifting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestack positioning stabilityVSAvoidcontainer or sheet damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the confinement walls from the positioning zone, extracting the harmful element that caused damage to containers and sheets while maintaining positioning stability through alternative means (positioning sensors and controlled lifting mechanisms).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces positioning sensors and controlled lifting mechanisms as intermediary elements to replace the physical confinement walls, enabling stable positioning without direct contact between walls and containers/sheets, thus preventing damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If confinement walls are used to constrain the stack, then the layers remain in predefined position, but the system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayer position stabilityVSAvoidpositioning zone complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the confinement walls from the positioning zone, reducing structural complexity and cost while maintaining layer position stability through sensor-based control and simplified mechanical constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the positioning approach from physical confinement (walls) to parameter-based control (sensor detection and controlled lifting), reducing device complexity while maintaining positioning stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the removal head uses suction and sliding to move the upper layer, then the layer can be removed without confinement walls, but precise positioning requires additional sensors and control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayer removal efficiencyVSAvoidpositioning control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical confinement with a suction-based removal system, allowing layer removal without physical walls. The suction force and sliding motion work together to move the layer, eliminating the need for confinement structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates positioning sensors that provide feedback to the control system, enabling precise positioning and adjustment of the removal head and unloading support, ensuring accurate layer removal without confinement walls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and damage-free depalletising of loose container layers by minimizing contact with containment walls, optimizing movement and reducing the risk of container or sheet damage.

Implementation Method 1

The removal head 3 comprises suction means 30. They perform a suction action on the layer of containers. This causes a stiffening of the layer of containers, which are constrained to the head 3 by suction.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentUS20260008637A1Depalletising system and method
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 CLEVERTECH
  • US20260008637A1 patent drawing
  • US20260008637A1 patent drawing
  • US20260008637A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A depalletising system, including:a zone for positioning a stack of layers of loose containers;a head for removing an upper layer of said layers of the stack; the removal head being suitable for moving said upper layer by sliding; the removal head including at least one sidewall for pushing the upper layer;an unloading support movable with respect to the stack and that allows the upper layer moved by the removal head to be supported;sensor means that allow the reaching of a desired position of the support with respect to the upper layer to be detected.