Sensor-Guided Food Transfer Module for Variable Rack Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated food production systems face inefficiencies due to manual intervention, lack of adaptability to variable food item sizes and access locations, and limited space utilization, leading to increased labor costs and error-prone transfers in dynamic food service environments.

Innovation Solution

An automated food system with a transfer module featuring a frame, vertical drive, linear stage, and articulating arm assembly, equipped with sensors and processors, enables flexible three-dimensional movement and precise positioning of food items, accommodating various rack structures and access geometries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If manual intervention is used for food item transfer, then labor flexibility is maintained, but labor costs increase and error rates rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of food item transferVSAvoidcomplexity of transfer system
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transfer module employs a robotic arm with multiple articulated joints that can dynamically adjust its position and orientation to accommodate variable food item sizes and access locations. The system transitions from static rigid structures to dynamic movable components, enabling adaptive automation while managing complexity through controlled flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The transfer module is designed as a multi-functional system that can handle various food item types, sizes, and weights using the same robotic arm and end effector. The system provides universal automation capability across different food service environments, reducing the need for multiple specialized devices and thereby managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If rigid material handling systems are used, then structural stability is maintained, but adaptability to variable food item sizes and access locations is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to variable food item sizes and access locationsVSAvoidstructural rigidity of transfer system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces rigid fixed structures with dynamic articulated robotic arms that can adjust their configuration in real-time. The robotic arm's multiple joints allow it to reach various access locations and accommodate different food item dimensions while maintaining operational stability through controlled movement and positioning systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The transfer module changes its operational parameters (position, orientation, speed, grip force) dynamically based on the detected food item characteristics and target location. This parameter adaptability enables the system to handle variable food item sizes and access locations while maintaining stable and precise transfers through real-time control adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automated transfer systems are implemented, then labor costs are reduced, but space utilization is limited by equipment dimensions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of food item transferVSAvoidspace footprint of transfer module
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arm assembly is nested within a compact frame structure, with components arranged in a space-efficient configuration. The articulated arms can fold or retract when not in use, and the end effector is integrated into the arm structure, minimizing the overall space footprint while maintaining full automation functionality and transfer efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes vertical space through the articulated robotic arm's ability to move in multiple dimensions, reducing the horizontal footprint. The robotic arm can reach laterally beyond the frame's perimeter while maintaining a compact base structure, effectively using three-dimensional space to achieve high productivity in limited floor space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If fixed access point geometries are used, then equipment simplicity is maintained, but flexibility to accommodate various rack structures is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with various rack structures and access geometriesVSAvoidcomplexity of positioning system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs sensors to detect the actual position of food items and rack structures, providing feedback to the control system. This feedback enables real-time adjustment of the robotic arm's trajectory and the end effector's positioning, allowing the system to adapt to various rack structures and access geometries while managing complexity through intelligent control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The positioning system transitions from fixed predetermined paths to dynamic adaptive trajectories. The robotic arm can adjust its movement path in real-time based on detected rack configurations and food item locations, providing versatility across different rack structures while maintaining manageable complexity through sensor-guided control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260080737A1Transfer Module
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 L2F INC
  • US20260080737A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080737A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080737A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated food system is provided that includes a vertically movable transfer module having an arm assembly with articulating arms and an end effector for transporting food items between storage, preparation, and cooking stations. The arm assembly is configured to extend laterally beyond the module frame and into a rack or adjacent station to retrieve or place items. A sensor mounted on the arm assembly detects spatial features of food items, enabling a processor to calculate location and size and control precise movement of the end effector. The system facilitates item transfer using coordinated vertical and planar motion based on sensor input.