Sensor Hub Leading Indicators for Personal Area Network Response Time

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sensor-based personal area networks face delays in responding to critical events, such as heart attacks, even when data is collected in real-time, due to the lag in identifying and acting upon important sensor data, especially when the individual is distant from a point-of-care.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilizes a personal area network (PAN) with sensors and a sensor hub to collect and analyze data, employing machine learning models to predict actions needed at a point-of-care, generating leading indicators and converting them into predicted actions, which can be transmitted to stakeholders in real-time for timely intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If sensor data is collected in real-time, then data availability is improved, but response time to critical events still lags

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata availabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously analyzing sensor data to generate leading indicators that predict critical events before they occur. The machine learning models process sensor data in advance to identify patterns indicating upcoming critical events, enabling proactive alerts rather than reactive responses to already-critical conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the analysis process into distinct components: sensor data collection, leading indicator generation, machine learning-based prediction, and alert generation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, with the machine learning models specifically handling the predictive analysis to reduce overall response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If traditional sensor monitoring systems are used, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but predictive capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidpredictive capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces machine learning models as intermediary components between sensor data collection and alert generation. These models act as mediators that process sensor data to generate leading indicators and predictions, bridging the gap between simple data collection and complex predictive analytics without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the analytical parameters from simple threshold-based monitoring to machine learning-based pattern recognition. By transforming how sensor data is processed and interpreted, the system gains predictive capability while maintaining the underlying sensor infrastructure and basic system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240087753A1Sensor-based leading indicators in a personal area network; systems, methods, and apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.03.14 NANT HOLDINGS IP LLC
  • US20240087753A1 patent drawing
  • US20240087753A1 patent drawing
  • US20240087753A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A sensor-based leading indicator management ecosystem is described. Sensor data associated with the individual, possibly within a Personal Area Network (PAN) and related to the healthcare of the individual, is compiled and converted to a one or more sets of leading indicators with respect to one or more possible future healthcare actions. Leading indicators may then be compiled into one or more condition state vectors that represent encoded inputs into one or more trained action prediction agents. The trained action prediction agents then generate, possibly in real-time or based on time-series data, predicted actions that may be required at a predicted point-of-care or a moment-of-care. Further, action prediction agents may be context or domain specific.