Sensor Interface Circuit Self-Testing for Common Cause Fault Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sensor interface circuits in safety-critical applications, such as automotive systems, face challenges in detecting common cause faults and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) issues when using sensors with different manufacturing technologies, leading to unreliable data and potential safety risks.

Innovation Solution

A sensor interface circuit with at least two sensor inputs and front-end circuits, featuring a test circuit that applies a test input intermittently to evaluate the correct functionality by comparing sensor signal acquisitions and test results, thereby increasing safety integrity without significantly increasing complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If two separate analog front-ends are used for reading out two sensors, then redundancy is provided for safety critical applications, but the device complexity increases and common cause faults cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety integrityVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the test signal generation and injection functionality into the existing analog front-end circuitry. The test circuit uses the same operational amplifiers, filters, and ADCs that are already present for sensor signal processing, thereby providing redundancy testing without adding significant circuit complexity. The test signal is injected through the existing differential input structure, merging test and operational functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The analog front-end circuitry performs self-testing by generating internal test signals and processing them through its own signal path. The operational amplifiers, filters, and ADCs test themselves by processing test signals that mimic real sensor outputs, enabling the system to detect faults in its own components without requiring separate external test equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If sensors with different manufacturing technologies are used, then diversity is achieved to reduce common cause faults, but electromagnetic compatibility issues and signal distortion occur due to longer electrical connections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidEMC sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary test signal that is generated and processed entirely within the analog front-end circuitry on the same chip. This eliminates the need for long external electrical connections between separate sensor chips and interface chips. The test signal acts as an intermediary that allows fault detection without requiring physical separation of sensor and interface functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The test signal generation and processing is nested within the existing analog front-end circuit structure. The test functionality is embedded inside the operational amplifiers, filters, and ADCs that are already present for sensor signal processing. This nesting allows the test functions to utilize the same signal path and components without requiring external connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Ease of manufacture

If the same design is used for both analog front-ends, then design consistency is maintained, but common cause faults like design weaknesses and fabrication process weaknesses cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign consistencyVSAvoidfault detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by comparing the outputs of two identical analog front-ends processing the same test signal. The processing device compares the test results from both front-ends and can identify discrepancies that indicate faults. This feedback mechanism allows detection of common cause faults while maintaining design consistency, as the comparison reveals deviations from expected behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces asymmetry in the testing approach by independently testing each analog front-end with test signals and comparing their responses. Although the front-end designs are symmetric and identical, the testing process creates asymmetry by separately evaluating each channel's performance and comparing results, enabling detection of faults that would affect both channels equally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP4080168B1Sensor interfaces for functional safety applications
Publication Date: 2024.10.16 MELEXIS TECH NV
  • EP4080168B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4080168B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4080168B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A sensor interface circuit (100) comprising: at least two sensor inputs (111, 112) and at least two front-end circuits (121, 122) to obtain sensor signal acquisitions from the at least two sensor inputs; a test circuit (131, 132) configured to test correct functionality of at least part of one of the front end circuits (121, 122) by applying a test input to the front end circuit under test, by reading a test output of the front end circuit, and by comparing the test output with an expected result thus obtaining at least one test result, wherein the test input is applied intermittently between sensor signal acquisitions; a processing device (140) configured for comparing the sensor signal acquisitions from the different sensor inputs and for combining the comparison with the at least one test result in order to evaluate correct functionality of the sensor interface circuit.