Sensor Network Identity Determination via Reference Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing passenger transport installations, such as elevators and escalators, face challenges in efficiently and cost-effectively determining the identity of sensors within their sensor networks, particularly in retrofitting older systems, due to the need for individual sensor configuration and logistical efforts.

Innovation Solution

A sensor network with a master unit and sensor nodes that utilize a signal transmission means, such as a bus system, and a sensor detection module to determine sensor identities based on reference measurement results, sensor node configurations, and pre-established information stored in a database, allowing for automatic identification without requiring unique physical designs or extensive configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If individual sensors are configured with unique identities and wired to a central controller, then sensor identity determination is reliable, but installation complexity and logistical efforts increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor identity determinationVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor nodes automatically determine their own identities by autonomously measuring operating parameters during operation and comparing them with reference values stored in the database. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for manual configuration of unique sensor identities, reducing installation complexity while maintaining reliable identification through automatic parameter-based differentiation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Reference measurement results are pre-stored in a database before the sensor network becomes operational. During installation and commissioning, the system performs preliminary automatic determination of sensor identities by comparing initial parameter measurements against these pre-established references, avoiding the need for complex individual configuration procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If manual configuration of each sensor is performed, then accurate sensor identification is achieved, but installation time and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor identification accuracyVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Each sensor node automatically performs identification by measuring its own operating parameters and comparing them with reference values. This self-service approach achieves accurate sensor identification without requiring manual configuration, thereby significantly reducing installation time and associated costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from measured operating parameters to automatically determine sensor identities. By continuously monitoring parameters such as acceleration, temperature, or electrical current and comparing them against reference values, the system achieves precise identification without manual intervention, reducing both time and cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If identical sensors of the same type are used throughout the network, then production and inventory are simplified, but sensor identity determination becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor production simplicityVSAvoidsensor identity differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system differentiates identical sensors by detecting changes in their operating parameters during operation. Each sensor node measures parameters such as acceleration patterns, temperature profiles, or electrical characteristics that naturally vary based on the sensor's specific location and function. These parameter variations serve as unique identifiers, allowing the system to distinguish between identical sensors without requiring different hardware models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Each identical sensor node autonomously determines its identity by measuring its own operating parameters and comparing them with reference values. This self-service mechanism enables the system to differentiate between identical sensors based on their operational characteristics rather than physical design differences, maintaining manufacturing simplicity while enabling accurate identification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11208294B2Sensor network for a passenger transport system
Publication Date: 2021.12.28 INVENTIO AG
  • US11208294B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A passenger transport system sensor network has a master unit, a signal-transferring apparatus, and a plurality of sensor nodes each having at least one sensor sensing a physical measurement variable and transferring the sensed variable to the master unit via the signal-transferring apparatus. A sensor-identifying module in the master unit determines the identity of the sensors from information, stored in a database, of: a first information type about reference measurement results to be typically provided by a particular sensor under already known conditions; a second information type about the identity of a sensor node containing the particular sensor, the sensor node having a plurality of different sensors or a plurality of identical sensors in different configurations; and/or a third information type about a configuration of a sensor node holding the particular sensor, which configuration was defined in advance. Sensor identities and installation locations can be determined in an automated manner.