Sensor Network Programming via Parameter Association

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sensor networks face inefficiencies in programming, particularly when dealing with multiple sensors of the same design installed at different locations, as they often require individual pre-programming and lack effective collision detection, leading to potential data collisions and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for programming a sensor network that associates sensor identification with installation location and system function, and prescribed operating data, allowing for differentiated programming of sensors without prior installation and enabling reprogramming without hardware changes, using associations stored in a data memory or external database.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If individual pre-programming is performed for each sensor before installation, then programming accuracy is improved, but time consumption and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining parameter associations between sensor types and installation locations in a database before actual installation. This allows the programming system to automatically retrieve and apply appropriate parameters during installation, achieving both programming accuracy and time efficiency without manual pre-programming of each sensor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary database that stores associations between sensor identification parameters and installation location parameters. This intermediary structure enables automatic parameter retrieval and matching, eliminating the need for time-consuming individual pre-programming while maintaining programming accuracy through structured data relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple sensors of the same design are used, then cost is reduced, but differentiation and collision detection become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor differentiationVSAvoidprogramming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning specific installation location parameters and operating parameters to each sensor based on its unique identification and installation position. This allows sensors of the same design to be differentiated through their location-specific parameter assignments, enabling precise control and collision detection without increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by storing and applying different operating parameters (such as start times, channel assignments, and configuration data) for sensors based on their installation locations and functions. This enables differentiation of identical sensors through parameter variation rather than hardware modification, maintaining simplicity while achieving functional distinction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If sensors are programmed after installation, then flexibility is improved, but risk of data collisions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming flexibilityVSAvoidcollision detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing parameter associations in a database that include collision detection rules and unique identification mappings. This allows the system to automatically detect and prevent data collisions during the programming process, even as sensors are installed and configured dynamically, maintaining both flexibility and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through automatic collision detection mechanisms that monitor parameter assignments during programming. The system provides feedback when potential collisions are detected, allowing operators to correct assignments before they cause problems, thus maintaining reliability while preserving programming flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10097370B2Method and system for programming a sensor network
Publication Date: 2018.10.09 VITESCO TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
  • US10097370B2 patent drawing
  • US10097370B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure may be embodied in a method for programming a sensor network having a plurality of sensors including: providing a first association between a first parameter and a second parameter, wherein the first parameter represents a sensor identification and the second parameter represents an installation location or a system function of the respective sensor; providing a second association between the second parameter and a third parameter representing prescribed operating data for the respective sensor; ascertaining a third association on the basis of the first association and the second association, the third association between the first parameter and the third parameter, and programming the plurality of sensors on the basis of the third association.