Sensor Network for Property Loss Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current insurance systems lack effective early warning and loss mitigation systems for homeowners, leading to increased damage and costs due to delayed detection of issues like hail damage, which could be mitigated with automated detection and notification systems.

Innovation Solution

A computerized system that processes data from sensors associated with insured properties to identify cost-saving operational changes, calculates realized savings, and transfers funds based on implemented changes, utilizing a network of sensors and data analysis to inform insurance policy adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automated sensor devices and data analysis systems are implemented to detect property damage early, then loss mitigation and cost savings are improved, but device complexity and implementation costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloss mitigation capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex monitoring task into multiple specialized sensor devices (e.g., sensors for detecting hail impact, water intrusion, structural movement) that each perform a specific detection function. These segmented sensors communicate with a central processing system, allowing the overall system to achieve high reliability through distributed specialized detection rather than a single complex device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A computer processing system acts as an intermediary between the sensor devices and the insurance company. This intermediary receives data from multiple sensors, performs automated analysis to detect damage patterns, and communicates findings to relevant parties. The intermediary simplifies the overall system architecture by centralizing data processing and reducing the complexity at individual sensor nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If manual claim detection by homeowners is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but loss mitigation effectiveness deteriorates due to delayed detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoiddetection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Sensor devices are installed and configured in advance to continuously monitor property conditions before damage occurs. The system performs preliminary detection of potential issues (e.g., minor hail impacts, early water intrusion signs) and alerts homeowners and insurance companies before significant damage develops, enabling preventive action rather than reactive response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes continuous feedback loops where sensor data is automatically analyzed and communicated to homeowners and insurance companies in real-time or near-real-time. This feedback mechanism eliminates the delayed manual detection process by providing immediate notifications when damage is detected, allowing for rapid response and mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive sensor monitoring is deployed across all insured properties, then measurement precision of damage detection is improved, but cost of implementation and operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage detection accuracyVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements monitoring at appropriate levels without requiring exhaustive comprehensive surveillance of every property aspect. Sensors are deployed to detect specific high-value damage types (e.g., hail impact, water intrusion) rather than monitoring all possible property conditions. This partial monitoring approach achieves sufficient measurement precision for critical damage types while controlling operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system processes sensor data to detect changes in physical parameters (e.g., impact force, moisture levels, structural displacement) that indicate damage. By focusing on detecting parameter changes rather than continuous comprehensive monitoring, the system achieves high measurement precision for damage detection while reducing operational costs through event-triggered rather than continuous high-power operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10839410B1System and method to provide savings based on reduced energy consumption
Publication Date: 2020.11.17 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA)
  • US10839410B1 patent drawing
  • US10839410B1 patent drawing
  • US10839410B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer device and method for processing informatic data from one or more sensor devices associated with a property covered by an insurance policy. Analysis is performed on the informatic data received from sensor devices to determine a cost associated with operating the insured property. Operational changes are identified and recommended regarding one or more operational aspects of the insured property to achieve a cost savings for operating the insured property. If one or more recommended operational changes are implemented, a cost savings is calculated which is attributable to the one or more operational changes. Monetary funds are transferred from a first financial account to a second financial account associated with a user of the insured property whereby the transfer funds amount is dependent upon the calculated cost savings.