Sensor Offset Determination in Motor Vehicle Steering Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sensor systems in motor vehicle steering systems face inaccuracies due to design-induced constant offsets, which can falsify measured variables, necessitating effective offset correction methods for achieving sufficient measuring accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A method and device for determining sensor offset by generating a predetermined relative motion between two components using an actuator, measuring this motion with a sensor, and calculating the offset from stored data, while accounting for dynamic friction and position-dependent deviations, allowing for periodic and symmetrical motion to simplify and improve measurement accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a sensor is used to monitor mechanical variables in a steering system, then the position and motion can be detected, but design-induced constant offsets falsify the measured variables and reduce measurement accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidsensor offset
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing offset determination before normal operation. The control unit generates a predetermined relative motion between the steering wheel and steering column, measures the sensor output during this motion, and calculates the offset value in advance. This pre-calculated offset is then stored and used to correct all subsequent measurements, eliminating the harmful effect of the constant offset from design variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If static friction between components is present, then the measurement can be falsified or made impossible, but generating and measuring motion cancels out static friction contributions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidstatic friction
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transforming the measurement from a static condition to a dynamic condition. Instead of measuring the sensor output at a fixed position where static friction dominates, the control unit generates a predetermined relative motion between components. During this motion, only dynamic friction acts on the system, and its contributions cancel out over the complete motion cycle. This dynamic measurement approach eliminates the harmful effect of static friction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If the measurement method accounts for dynamic friction components only, then the measurement is significantly simplified, but this requires generating and measuring relative motion between components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement simplicityVSAvoidmeasurement process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by using the sensor itself to measure the motion that is generated for calibration. The control unit generates a predetermined relative motion between the steering wheel and steering column, and the same sensor that will be used for normal operation measures this motion. The sensor data during this self-generated motion is processed to determine the offset, eliminating the need for external calibration equipment or complex measurement setups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If the relative motion is periodic and symmetrical with maximum amplitudes, then only symmetrical friction components occur which cancel out, facilitating evaluation of sensor data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata evaluation accuracyVSAvoidmotion frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by using a periodic and symmetrical relative motion between the steering wheel and steering column. The control unit generates this periodic motion with specific characteristics (symmetrical about the neutral position, with defined maximum amplitudes), causing only symmetrical dynamic friction components to occur during the motion cycle. These symmetrical friction components cancel out when evaluating the sensor data over the complete period, facilitating accurate offset determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11738803B2Method and device for determining a sensor offset
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 ZF AUTOMOTIVE GERMANY GMBH
  • US11738803B2 patent drawing
  • US11738803B2 patent drawing
  • US11738803B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a sensor offset of a sensor in a device, in particular in a steering system for a motor vehicle. The device has a first component, a second component which is movable with respect to the first component, a resetting element, an actuator and a sensor for determining the relative motion between the first component and the second component. The method comprises the following steps: firstly, a predetermined relative motion between the first component and the second component is generated by the actuator. The resulting relative motion is measured by means of the sensor, and the sensor data obtained from the measurement are stored. A constant sensor offset of the sensor is then determined on the basis of the stored sensor data. Furthermore, a device is described whose sensor offset can be determined by means of the method.