Hardware Controller Decouples Sensor Power and Data Lines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computing devices lack secure and efficient methods to control the sensing states of sensors, such as microphones and cameras, which can be compromised by processor software hacks, leading to security and fidelity issues.

Innovation Solution

A controller separate from the processor is used to decouple sensors from the power source and data lines, with a mute button and switch system to enable or disable sensing states, ensuring secure and graceful shutdowns, and using a light source for feedback and indication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the processor controls the sensing state of sensors through software, then the device is easy to operate and control, but security and fidelity are compromised due to potential software hacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor controlVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into two independent control paths: a secure hardware-based controller that directly controls sensor power and data lines, and a processor that runs application software. The hardware controller is segmented from processor software control, preventing software hacks from compromising sensor security while maintaining operational control through the hardware controller's button interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A dedicated hardware controller acts as an intermediary between the processor software and the sensors. This intermediary receives requests from the processor but ultimately executes control decisions through hardware switches that directly manage power and data connections to sensors, blocking malicious software commands while allowing legitimate operational control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If the sensor remains continuously connected to power and data lines, then the sensor is always ready for immediate operation, but security control and graceful shutdown become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor response timeVSAvoidsecurity control
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The hardware controller preliminarily establishes secure control over sensor power and data connections before any software execution occurs. By pre-configuring hardware switches to control power and data lines, the system ensures that sensor connectivity can be immediately severed for security reasons, and that graceful shutdown procedures can be initiated by simply activating the hardware controller's shutdown logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts sensor connectivity state through hardware switches controlled by the secure hardware controller. The switches can transition between connected and disconnected states based on security requirements, allowing the system to optimize between immediate readiness (connected) and security control (disconnected) as conditions change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If a separate hardware controller is introduced to manage sensor power and data lines, then security and fidelity are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidcontrol architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hardware controller is designed as a universal multi-functional component that can manage multiple sensors of different types (microphones, cameras, etc.) through standardized interfaces. It provides power control, data line control, and shutdown functionality across various sensor types, reducing the need for separate control circuits for each sensor and thereby limiting the increase in overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If the system uses redundant signals and delayed notifications for graceful shutdown, then fidelity and security are improved, but response time and productivity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefidelityVSAvoidshutdown delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic signaling where the hardware controller sends shutdown commands through multiple phases: first a shutdown request signal to the processor, then a delayed confirmation signal after the specified time interval. This periodic action pattern ensures faithful execution of shutdown procedures while making the time delay predictable and manageable, allowing systems to plan for the delay without unexpected interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11586268B2Stopping sensing state of a sensor based on power decoupling and data decoupling
Publication Date: 2023.02.21 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US11586268B2 patent drawing
  • US11586268B2 patent drawing
  • US11586268B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described for controlling a sensing state of a device. For example, a controller of the device receives input data indicating a request to disable a sensor of the device. The controller determines that the sensor is not disabled and is to enter a mute state based on the input data. Accordingly, controller causes the sensor to be decoupled from a power source via a power switch, causes the sensor to be decoupled from a processor of the device via a data switch, and causes outputting of an indication of the mute state by a user interface of the device.