Sensor Verification Paths for Measurement and Hardware Fault Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sensor systems face challenges in accurately detecting errors and faults, particularly in measurement data, which can lead to safety issues due to factors like silicon defects, radioactivity, and environmental changes, and current self-test methods do not effectively account for these errors.

Innovation Solution

A sensor system that generates redundant data for verification and calibration purposes, utilizing a verification component to analyze data from multiple sensor elements via independent paths and interfaces, identifying faults and providing error handling commands or calibration data to mitigate errors within a specified fault reaction time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If self-test of calculations is performed to detect hardware faults, then hardware fault detection capability is improved, but measurement errors and faults are not accounted for

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware fault detectionVSAvoidmeasurement error detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the sensor data processing into multiple independent paths (first path and second path) that process the same sensor data differently. This segmentation allows each path to be verified independently, enabling detection of measurement errors that would affect only one path while maintaining hardware fault detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a copy of the sensor data processing through a second independent path that mirrors the first path. By comparing the results from both paths, the system can identify measurement errors without compromising the hardware fault detection mechanism. The redundant copy serves as a verification mechanism for measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If redundant data generation and verification is implemented, then fault detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification component performs multiple functions: it verifies calculation data from the first path using the second path, detects hardware faults, and identifies measurement errors. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each function, thereby limiting the increase in system complexity while improving fault detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own redundant processing paths to verify each other's results. The first and second paths serve as mutual verification mechanisms, eliminating the need for external verification systems. This self-service approach improves fault detection accuracy without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If multiple independent paths are used for data verification, then error identification capability is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror identificationVSAvoidfault reaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification by continuously maintaining both the first and second processing paths active and ready for comparison. Rather than sequentially processing and verifying data, both paths operate in parallel, preparing verification data in advance. This preliminary action reduces the fault reaction time while maintaining high error identification capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The verification process operates continuously with both processing paths running simultaneously rather than alternately. This continuous parallel operation ensures that verification is always available without interrupting the primary data processing flow, thereby minimizing loss of time while maintaining reliable error identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS10942046B2Sensor system using safety mechanism
Publication Date: 2021.03.09 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US10942046B2 patent drawing
  • US10942046B2 patent drawing
  • US10942046B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sensor device using verification includes a sensor component and a verification component. The sensor component is configured to generate first data and second data. The verification component is configured to analyze the first data and the second data and generate verification data based on the first data and the second data.