Sensor Saturation Fault Detection Using Comparator State Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sensor systems, particularly magnetic field sensors, face challenges in accurately diagnosing faults under critical conditions, leading to potential false positives and incorrect environmental attribute measurements due to material defects and environmental changes.

Innovation Solution

A diagnostic method and device that utilize signal comparator and saturation threshold values to compare current and previous amplified input signals, generating a diagnostic signal if certain conditions are met, allowing for continuous fault detection without interrupting the application function and using the same circuits for both diagnostic and sensing functions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sensor systems operate under critical conditions to detect faults, then diagnostic capability is improved, but false positives increase due to material defects and environmental changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoiddiagnostic accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the diagnostic process into multiple independent test phases (first test phase and second test phase) with different excitation current values. Each phase independently verifies sensor operation, allowing the system to distinguish between actual faults and transient anomalies caused by environmental factors, thereby reducing false positives while maintaining reliable fault detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary verification by comparing the first measurement result with the second measurement result before declaring a fault. This preliminary cross-validation action ensures that diagnostic decisions are based on consistent results across multiple tests, improving measurement precision without compromising the ability to detect critical faults

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If diagnostic tests are performed continuously to detect faults in real-time, then diagnostic speed is improved, but measurement cycle interruption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic speedVSAvoidmeasurement cycle interruption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic diagnostic testing where the excitation current is alternately set to first and second values at regular intervals during the measurement cycle. This periodic action enables continuous fault detection without requiring dedicated test periods, as the diagnostic measurements are integrated into the normal measurement rhythm, thus maintaining both diagnostic speed and measurement continuity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the measurement system multi-functional by using the same sensor and circuitry to perform both normal measurements and diagnostic tests. The excitation current serves dual purposes: providing operational current during normal measurement and diagnostic test current during verification phases. This universality eliminates the need for separate diagnostic hardware or dedicated test time, achieving continuous fault detection without interrupting the measurement cycle

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11209514B2Sensor saturation fault detection
Publication Date: 2021.12.28 MELEXIS BULGARIA LTD
  • US11209514B2 patent drawing
  • US11209514B2 patent drawing
  • US11209514B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for diagnosing errors in the correct operation of a sensor system. A positive signal amplifier saturation threshold value and a negative signal amplifier saturation threshold value less than the positive signal amplifier saturation threshold value are provided, and at least one signal comparator threshold value. A current value of a first amplified input signal at a first time is provided and a current value of a second amplified input signal obtained at a second time later than the first time, but in the same measurement cycle. The measured values of the first and second amplified input signal are compared to the current signal comparator threshold value. A new output state is determined via the measured first and second amplified input signals. From a previous comparison of the first and second amplified input signal a current output state is provided, from which an expected new output state is determined.