Sensor Saturation Input Control to Prevent Gesture False Positives

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face confusion and false positives due to the use of similar natural gestures for conflicting purposes and unintentional hand motions being interpreted as commands, leading to unintended system interactions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a saturation profile in a processor to recognize and utilize sensor saturation as a distinct input, where the sensor's field of view is fully or partially obstructed, to execute predefined commands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If natural gestures are used for system control, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to false positives from unintentional hand motions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of gesture executionVSAvoidaccuracy of gesture recognition
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter being monitored from general gesture recognition to specific sensor saturation detection. By detecting when the sensor reaches its maximum capacity (saturation), the system identifies deliberate gestures that fully obstruct the field of view, distinguishing them from partial obstructions caused by unintentional movements. This parameter change resolves the contradiction by maintaining ease of operation while improving reliability through a more specific detection criterion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If sensor saturation is used as input, then reliability is improved by reducing false positives, but device complexity increases due to saturation profile management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of input detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of saturation profile processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor itself provides the saturation information needed for detection. The sensor's inherent saturation characteristic (reaching maximum capacity) serves as the detection mechanism, eliminating the need for complex external analysis systems. The processor simply compares sensor output against predefined saturation thresholds, allowing the sensor to effectively detect its own saturation state and resolve the contradiction between improved reliability and reduced complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If saturation profile comparison is implemented, then false positives are reduced, but loss of time increases due to additional processing steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereduction of false positivesVSAvoidprocessing time for saturation check
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The saturation profile is pre-established and stored in the processor before runtime operation. By preparing the saturation thresholds and comparison criteria in advance, the system eliminates the need for complex real-time analysis during gesture detection. The processor only needs to perform a simple comparison between current sensor output and pre-computed saturation values, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining high reliability in distinguishing deliberate gestures from false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260056618A1Methods and apparatuses for controlling a system via a sensor
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 WEST TEXAS TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS LLC
  • US20260056618A1 patent drawing
  • US20260056618A1 patent drawing
  • US20260056618A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system, apparatus, and/or device for sensing determining levels of an object to execute a command. The method, system, apparatus, and/or device may include: sensing an object that occupies a first portion of a field of view (FOV) of the sensor at a first point in time; determining a first saturation level of the object at the first portion of the FOV; sensing the object that occupies a second portion of the FOV of the sensor at a second point in time; determining a second saturation level of the object at the second portion of the FOV; determining that the first saturation level is different than the second saturation level; and in response to the first saturation level being different than the second saturation level, executing an executable command associated with the first saturation level and the second saturation level.