Wireless Sensor Configuration Management via Normality Parameters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless connectivity issues and interference in sensor networks can lead to delayed or missed sensor readings, compromising the accuracy of predictions and anomaly detection in decision support systems for utility infrastructure management.

Innovation Solution

A method that dynamically optimizes the configuration of wireless connections by comparing sensor readings with forecast values and assessing the reliability of data transfer, adjusting bandwidth, power, frequency, channel allocation, or routing to ensure timely and accurate data delivery, using a transmission control system that evaluates normality and reliability parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If wireless communication configuration is optimized dynamically, then data delivery reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata delivery reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic optimization of wireless communication configuration by continuously monitoring data delivery reliability metrics and automatically adjusting transmission parameters such as bandwidth, power, frequency, channel allocation, and routing based on real-time conditions, thereby resolving the contradiction between improving reliability and increasing system complexity through adaptive control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms by comparing actual sensor reading delivery against expected delivery patterns, detecting anomalies in data arrival timing and reliability, and using this feedback to trigger configuration adjustments, thus improving data delivery reliability while maintaining manageable system complexity through closed-loop control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If wireless communication configuration is optimized dynamically, then anomaly detection accuracy is maintained, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes operational parameters dynamically by adjusting wireless communication settings (bandwidth, power, frequency, channel allocation, routing) based on monitored reliability metrics and anomaly detection requirements, optimizing the balance between maintaining measurement precision for anomaly detection and minimizing energy consumption for operational costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If wireless communication configuration is optimized dynamically, then network resource usage is reduced, but configuration management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork resource usageVSAvoidconfiguration management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically monitoring its own data delivery reliability, detecting anomalies in transmission performance, and autonomously adjusting its wireless communication configuration without external intervention, thereby reducing network resource usage while managing configuration complexity through self-contained automated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10404535B2Method for managing the configuration of a wireless connection used to transmit sensor readings from a sensor to a data collection facility
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 KK TOSHIBA
  • US10404535B2 patent drawing
  • US10404535B2 patent drawing
  • US10404535B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for managing the configuration of a wireless connection used to transmit sensor readings from a sensor to a data collection facility, the method comprising receiving a sensor reading from the sensor, comparing the value of the sensor reading with a forecast value for the sensor reading, determining the value of a normality parameter for the sensor, wherein the value of the normality parameter defines the extent to which the value of the sensor reading differs from the forecast value; and determining whether to retain a current configuration of the wireless connection between the sensor and data collection facility or to change the configuration, wherein the determination to retain the current configuration or change configuration is based at least in part on the value of the normality parameter.