Sensorized Adhesive Skin for Reversible Underwater Grasping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing synthetic adhesives struggle to achieve strong and reversible attachment to underwater surfaces due to the reduction in effectiveness of van der Waals, electrostatic, and hydrogen bond mechanisms, lacking the sensing and control capabilities of natural organisms like cephalopods.

Innovation Solution

A switchable adhesive system integrated with pneumatically actuated membranes and micro-LIDAR optical proximity sensors for real-time object detection and control, enabling autonomous adhesion and release through positive or negative pressure differentials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional synthetic adhesives are used underwater, then they can provide attachment to surfaces, but their effectiveness is dramatically reduced due to water interference with van der Waals forces, electrostatic forces, and hydrogen bonds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive strengthVSAvoidwater interference
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the adhesion mechanism from molecular forces (van der Waals, electrostatic, hydrogen bonds) to mechanical interlocking and friction-based adhesion. The compliant adhesive skin with microstructures can deform to conform to surface irregularities, creating mechanical interlocking that is insensitive to water presence. This parameter change in the fundamental adhesion mechanism resolves the contradiction between maintaining adhesive strength and operating in underwater environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If natural adhesive mechanisms like van der Waals forces are used, then strong adhesion can be achieved in dry environments, but these mechanisms become ineffective in wet or underwater conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive strengthVSAvoidenvironmental adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from environment-sensitive molecular adhesion to environment-insensitive mechanical adhesion. The compliant material with microstructures maintains effective adhesion through physical interlocking and friction, which remain functional underwater. This parameter change enables the adhesive to adapt to different environments (dry and wet) while maintaining consistent performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If synthetic adhesives are designed for strong attachment, then they can provide reliable bonding, but they lack the reversible and quickly activatable characteristics of natural adhesive systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment reliabilityVSAvoidreversibility and activation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention incorporates a compliant, dynamically deformable adhesive skin with microstructures that can actively adjust its configuration. The skin can deform to engage or disengage from surfaces, enabling rapid activation and release. This dynamic behavior, combined with the mechanical interlocking mechanism, provides both reliable attachment when engaged and easy reversibility when released, resolving the contradiction between attachment reliability and operational ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Extent of automation

If adhesive systems are made switchable and sensorized like cephalopod systems, then autonomous control and dexterous manipulation can be achieved, but the device complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous adhesive controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the adhesive function with sensing and control capabilities into an integrated compliant skin system. The microstructured adhesive elements are embedded with sensors and controlled actuation mechanisms, allowing autonomous detection and response to environmental stimuli. This merging reduces the need for separate complex subsystems while achieving cephalopod-like autonomous adhesive control, resolving the contradiction between automation extent and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves rapid adhesion switching (up to 450×) and reliable manipulation of diverse underwater objects, mimicking cephalopod adhesion with low preload and independent control of adhesive strength and toughness.

Implementation Method 1

Application of a negative pressure can adhere the individual element to the object. Application of a positive pressure can release the individual element from the object.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

The plurality of proximity sensing elements can comprise optical proximity sensors. The optical proximity sensors can utilize laser-based sensing.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Implementation Method 3

by applying negative pressure the membrane can be retracted to increase the volume of the adhesive element at the interface, creating a suction pressure and enhancing adhesion.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentUS20260014712A1Sensorized adhesive skins for underwater grasping of objects
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 VIRGINIA TECH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES INC
  • US20260014712A1 patent drawing
  • US20260014712A1 patent drawing
  • US20260014712A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various examples are provided related to underwater grasping of objects. In one example. an underwater adhesive system includes switchable adhesive elements, proximity sensing elements, and a controller. Each of the switchable adhesive elements can be pneumatically actuated to control adhesion or release of that switchable adhesive element. One of the switchable adhesive elements can be positioned adjacent to each of the proximity sensing elements. The controller can control adhesion of the switchable adhesive elements based at least in part upon signals from the proximity sensing elements.