Sensorized Hammer Testing for Non-Destructive Weld Fault Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for detecting welding faults in vehicle parts, such as visual inspection and cutting inspection, are inadequate as they either fail to identify welding depth or misalignment and require destruction of parts for sampling inspection, limiting their applicability for total inspection.

Innovation Solution

A fault detection apparatus utilizing a hammer device with a force sensor and vibration sensor to apply and measure forces, calculate frequency response functions, and determine faultiness based on peak values in predetermined regions, enabling non-destructive total inspection of welding parts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If visual inspection method is used, then total inspection can be performed, but welding depth and misalignment cannot be identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal inspection capabilityVSAvoidwelding depth and misalignment detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces visual inspection with mechanical impact testing. A hammer applies controlled impact forces to the welded workpiece, and sensors detect the resulting vibrations and acoustic emissions. This mechanical testing method enables both total inspection coverage and precise detection of welding defects including depth and misalignment that are invisible to visual inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces sensors as intermediary devices between the hammer impact and the inspection result. These sensors capture vibration signals and acoustic emissions generated during impact, serving as mediators that translate mechanical responses into detectable data for identifying welding defects such as insufficient penetration and misalignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If cutting inspection method is used, then welding fault can be accurately determined, but total inspection cannot be performed due to part destruction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding fault detection accuracyVSAvoidtotal inspection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces destructive cutting inspection with non-destructive mechanical impact testing. By analyzing vibration characteristics and acoustic emissions from hammer impacts, the system can accurately identify welding faults without cutting or damaging the workpiece, thereby enabling inspection of 100% of produced parts rather than only sampled portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The workpiece itself serves as the testing medium - its natural vibration response to hammer impact reveals its structural integrity and welding quality. No external destructive action is needed; the workpiece's own mechanical behavior under controlled impact provides the inspection data, eliminating the need for cutting or sampling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If conventional inspection methods are used, then simple equipment can be employed, but comprehensive fault detection is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment simplicityVSAvoidcomprehensive fault detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a multi-functional inspection system where a single hammer device with integrated sensors serves multiple detection purposes. The same impact mechanism and sensor system detect various welding defects including cracks, insufficient penetration, misalignment, and other faults, replacing multiple specialized inspection methods with one universal device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate and comprehensive inspection of welding parts by comparing frequency response functions, allowing for quick identification of faults without damaging the parts, thus overcoming the limitations of existing methods.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic body provided on the upper body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The support may be formed of an elastic material to absorb vibration of the hammer and the elastic body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration absorption: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS12172239B2Hammer device, apparatus for detecting fault of welded part, and method using the same
Publication Date: 2024.12.24 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12172239B2 patent drawing
  • US12172239B2 patent drawing
  • US12172239B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment hammer device includes a driver, an upper body configured to move in a direction set by power generated from the driver, an elastic body provided on the upper body, a hammer provided in the elastic body, a force sensor provided in the hammer, and a support configured to support the elastic body and the hammer.