Sensorless Inverter Control via Torque Flux Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing industrial automation systems face inefficiencies in controlling power converters under varying motor speeds and load conditions, leading to increased power usage and difficulty in minimizing power loss without speed and load sensors.

Innovation Solution

A control system that uses torque and flux current feedback to determine optimal operating parameters for inverters, such as voltage magnitude and frequency, without relying on speed or load sensors, thereby minimizing power loss during dynamic changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If speed sensors and load sensors are used to control power converters, then motor control precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor control precisionVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the speed and load measurement functions from separate physical sensors and integrates them into the existing current feedback system. By using torque current (which reflects load) and existing current measurements (which can derive speed through integration or frequency analysis), the system achieves sensorless control, eliminating the need for additional speed and load sensors while maintaining control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses torque current as an intermediary parameter that indirectly provides information about both load conditions and motor speed. The torque current feedback serves as a mediator that allows the control system to infer load and speed without direct measurement, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional control methods are used for steady-state operation, then control simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to dynamic speed and load changes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to dynamic conditionsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control by continuously adjusting the inverter operating parameters based on real-time torque current feedback. The control system dynamically modifies voltage and frequency commands according to changing load conditions, enabling the system to adapt to dynamic speed and load variations while maintaining a relatively simple control architecture that builds upon existing feedback mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback control using torque current measurements to continuously monitor and adjust motor operation. The torque current feedback loop enables the system to detect changes in load and speed conditions and automatically adjust control parameters, providing adaptability to dynamic conditions without requiring complex open-loop control schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If inverter operating parameters are not optimized, then control simplicity is maintained, but power loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower lossVSAvoidparameter optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes inverter operating parameters by dynamically changing voltage magnitude and frequency commands based on torque current feedback. The control system adjusts these parameters to maintain optimal motor efficiency across varying load conditions, reducing power losses without requiring complex optimization algorithms by leveraging the inherent relationship between torque current and optimal operating points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient operation of induction motors by dynamically adjusting flux current in proportion to torque current, reducing power loss and improving energy savings during changing loads and speeds.

Implementation Method 1

an inverter configured to convert a direct current (DC) voltage to an alternating current (AC) voltage and configured to supply the AC voltage to a motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Energy Conversion:

Data Source

PatentUS11258388B1Systems and methods for performing motor control operations agnostic of speed data
Publication Date: 2022.02.22 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • US11258388B1 patent drawing
  • US11258388B1 patent drawing
  • US11258388B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system may include an inverter configured to convert a direct current (DC) voltage to an alternating current (AC) voltage. The system may also include a control system communicatively coupled to the inverter. The control system may receive a torque current feedback from a motor and may generate, based on the torque current feedback, a command torque current and a command flux current. The control system may generate, based on the command torque current and the command flux current, a command torque voltage and a command flux voltage and may generate, based on a slip frequency and a rotor frequency, a command frequency. The control system may determine one or more operating parameters for the inverter based on the command frequency, the command torque voltage, and the command flux voltage and may control the inverter based on the one or more operating parameters.