Sensorless Permanent Magnet Motor Startup With Estimator Convergence Check

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sensorless motor control systems for permanent magnet motors face challenges in accurately estimating operating conditions and transitioning between open loop and closed loop control modes, leading to potential faults and inefficiencies in power factor correction and motor performance.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that include an estimator module to estimate motor operating conditions, a rotor check module to evaluate convergence and signal fault conditions, and a pulse-width modulation module to control the inverter switches based on estimated parameters, allowing for seamless transitions between open loop and closed loop control modes and improving power factor correction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If sensorless motor control is used to eliminate physical sensors, then device complexity and cost are reduced, but measurement precision and reliability of operating condition estimation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidoperating condition estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an estimator as an intermediary component that indirectly determines motor operating conditions (rotor position, speed, flux) by processing measurable electrical parameters (currents, voltages) through mathematical models. This mediator approach allows sensorless control to achieve acceptable measurement precision without direct physical sensors, resolving the contradiction between reduced complexity and maintained accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical/physical sensors with an electronic estimation system that uses electrical measurements and mathematical algorithms (such as back-EMF analysis, flux observation, or model reference adaptive systems) to determine rotor position and speed. This substitution eliminates mechanical wear and sensor installation complexity while providing sufficient measurement precision for motor control applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If open loop control mode is used during startup, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability of control and fault detection worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestartup control simplicityVSAvoidcontrol mode transition reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by using open loop control mode during the startup phase to establish initial motor operation and gather electrical parameter data before transitioning to closed loop mode. This preliminary phase allows the estimator to initialize and begin converging, ensuring reliable operation when the more sophisticated closed loop control is subsequently engaged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing a time-based or condition-based transition mechanism that switches the control system from open loop to closed loop mode as the motor operates. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to benefit from the simplicity of open loop control during startup while transitioning to the reliability and precision of closed loop control during steady-state operation, with the transition point determined by estimator convergence criteria or predetermined time intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If estimator convergence is not verified within predetermined time, then fault detection capability is improved, but loss of time in determining fault conditions worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidfault determination time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements the skipping principle by establishing predetermined time limits for estimator convergence during startup. If the estimator fails to converge within this predetermined period, the system immediately skips further waiting and directly signals a fault condition. This approach prevents excessive time loss by setting reasonable convergence expectations and quickly identifying faults when convergence does not occur, balancing thorough fault detection with timely response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS9634593B2System and method for permanent magnet motor control
Publication Date: 2017.04.25 COPELAND LP
  • US9634593B2 patent drawing
  • US9634593B2 patent drawing
  • US9634593B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating an electric motor is disclosed. The method includes: starting the electric motor in an open loop control mode; operating an estimator that estimates operating conditions of the electric motor; and, while the electric motor is in the open loop control mode, evaluating a first parameter of the estimator. The method further includes: in response to the evaluation of the first parameter, determining whether the estimator has converged; and in response to a determination that the estimator has not converged within a predetermined period of time after starting the electric motor, signaling a first fault condition.