Sensorless Permanent Magnet Machine Control via Vector Tracking Observer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling permanent magnetic machines without mechanical position sensors are susceptible to noise, leading to inaccuracies and delays in rotor position estimation.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a state evaluator to determine operating speed ranges, a sensor to sense back electromotive force (EMF) currents, and a vector tracking observer to estimate rotor position and motion data using heterodyning and inertial models, eliminating the need for mechanical sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If arc-tangent function is used to estimate rotor position from filtered position, then position estimation is achieved, but noise susceptibility increases leading to inaccuracies and delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor position estimation accuracyVSAvoidnoise immunity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The estimation system is divided into multiple independent observers (primary Luenberger observer for position, secondary observer for velocity/acceleration, vector tracking observer for back-EMF) that process different aspects of the system separately. Each observer handles specific calculations independently, allowing optimized noise filtering for each function without compromising overall accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A secondary observer acts as an intermediary between the primary position estimation and the final control system. It processes the position data through additional filtering and differentiation stages, mediating the transfer of information while reducing noise propagation to the velocity and acceleration estimates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If mechanical position sensors (encoder or resolver) are used, then accurate position data is obtained, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition data accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses its own operational parameters (current, voltage, frequency) to generate position estimates without external sensing equipment. The motor's back-EMF and current characteristics serve as the sensing mechanism, eliminating the need for separate mechanical position sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Mechanical position sensors (encoders, resolvers) are replaced with an electronic estimation system based on electrical measurements. The physical mechanical sensing components are substituted with computational algorithms that derive position from electrical signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If back-EMF vectors are directly used for position estimation, then sensorless control is achieved, but noise susceptibility increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensorless control capabilityVSAvoidposition estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The back-EMF vectors are pre-processed through a vector tracking observer that performs preliminary estimation and filtering before being used by the secondary observer. This preliminary action cleans the signal and prepares it for more accurate position and velocity calculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where the estimated position and velocity are continuously refined based on the difference between predicted and actual electrical measurements. The observers use feedback from current and voltage measurements to correct and improve position estimation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the immunity to noise, providing more accurate and reliable rotor position and motion estimation, enabling effective control of permanent magnetic machines across varying speed ranges.

Implementation Method 1

A sensor is configured to sense current, of one or more output phases of an inverter, associated with back electromotive force (back EMF) of the machine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBack electromotive force (back EMF): Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP3703245B1Method and system for controlling a permanent magnet machine without a mechanical position sensor
Publication Date: 2022.06.08 DEERE & CO
  • EP3703245B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3703245B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3703245B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A sensor is configured to sense current, of one or more output phases of an inverter, associated with back electromotive force (back EMF) of the machine. A converter or electronic data processor is adapted to convert the sensed current into current vectors associated with a stationary reference frame. An estimator or current model is configured to estimate back-EMF vectors from the converted current vectors. A vector tracking observer or the electronic data processor is adapted to mix the back-EMF vectors and applying the mixed back-EMF vectors to a preliminary inertial model. A secondary observer or the data processor is operable to apply the output of the preliminary inertial model to a secondary inertial model in the second speed range to estimate position or motion data for the rotor.