Sensorless Rotor Position Detection in Permanent-Magnet Motors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining the rotor position in permanent-magnet motors, especially single-phase motors, face challenges such as increased complexity, susceptibility to electromagnetic noise, and reduced electrical power due to the need for Hall-effect sensors or suspension of excitation to detect back EMF transitions.

Innovation Solution

A method employing two schemes to determine rotor position based on current rate changes and voltage equations, allowing for rotor position detection without sensors and maintaining electrical power, using a single winding for both driving and position determination across varying speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a Hall-effect sensor is integrated within the motor to determine rotor position, then rotor position detection accuracy is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor position detection accuracyVSAvoidmotor design and manufacture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the rotor position detection function from a separate Hall-effect sensor and implements it through sensorless control algorithms that use existing motor windings and control circuitry. The detection functionality is taken out as a software-based solution rather than a hardware sensor integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the motor windings serve dual functions: they both drive the motor and enable rotor position detection through back EMF measurement. The control circuitry performs both motor control and position sensing functions, eliminating the need for dedicated sensor hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of information

If a Hall-effect sensor is used for rotor position detection, then rotor position information is obtained, but the sensor signal becomes susceptible to electromagnetic noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor position signal qualityVSAvoidelectromagnetic noise susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the Hall-effect sensor (a hardware component susceptible to noise) with a software-based detection algorithm that processes voltage and current signals. This substitution eliminates the physical sensor that would be exposed to electromagnetic interference from the motor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If excitation is suspended to detect back EMF transitions for rotor position determination, then rotor position can be detected, but electrical power delivered to the motor is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor position detection capabilityVSAvoidelectrical power to motor
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses partial excitation strategies where excitation is applied only to specific windings or for limited time periods sufficient to generate detectable back EMF signals, rather than suspending all excitation. This allows position detection while maintaining adequate power delivery to the motor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary excitation of windings before the main propulsion phase, using this excitation period to both position the rotor and detect position information. The excitation is timed and controlled to provide detection capability without significantly reducing overall power delivery during the motor's operating cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If a single-phase motor configuration is used, then device simplicity is improved, but sensorless rotor position determination becomes unfeasible using traditional multi-phase methods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor structure simplicityVSAvoidsensorless control applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control strategies for single-phase motors that adapt excitation timing and winding selection based on rotor position and operating conditions. The control system dynamically switches between different excitation patterns to enable position detection and maintain motor operation, making sensorless control feasible for single-phase configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies hardware requirements, reduces costs, and maintains high accuracy and power efficiency by switching between schemes based on speed and excitation voltage, effectively addressing the limitations of existing methods.

Implementation Method 1

During rotation, the rotor induces a back EMF in the winding, the magnitude of which depends on the angular position of the rotor.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

A permanent-magnet motor will often include a Hall-effect sensor, which outputs a signal indicative of the rotor position.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall effect: Hall Effect

Data Source

PatentUS9088238B2Method of determining the rotor position of a permanent-magnet motor
Publication Date: 2015.07.21 DYSON TECH LTD
  • US9088238B2 patent drawing
  • US9088238B2 patent drawing
  • US9088238B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of determining the position of a rotor of a permanent-magnet motor. The method uses two different schemes to determine the position of the rotor. A first scheme is used when the rotor rotates within a first speed range, by sequentially exciting and freewheeling a winding of the motor, measuring a parameter that depends on the rate of change of current in the winding, and comparing the parameter against a threshold. A second scheme is used when the rotor rotates within a second speed range, by generating a voltage signal that is proportional to the voltage across the winding, generating a further voltage signal that depends on the rate of change of current in the winding, and comparing the two signals.