Sentiment Analysis for Replacement Item Recommendations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Online systems face challenges in recommending replacement items that meet user satisfaction, as existing methods lack effective sentiment analysis to determine user preferences, leading to potential deterioration of the user experience when unavailable items are substituted.

Innovation Solution

The online system employs a machine-learned language model to analyze user feedback and generate sentiment scores for replacement items, determining whether to recommend them based on predicted sentiment scores, thereby improving the relevance of suggested alternatives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If replacement items are recommended based on availability alone, then the speed of order fulfillment is improved, but user satisfaction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment speedVSAvoiduser satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops by analyzing user comments and sentiments about replacement items, then using this feedback to refine future replacement recommendations. The machine-learned language model processes user feedback to generate sentiment scores that influence subsequent replacement item selections, creating a continuous improvement cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters for recommendation by introducing sentiment scores as a new criterion alongside traditional availability-based selection. The machine-learned language model transforms qualitative user feedback into quantitative sentiment parameters, enabling nuanced differentiation between replacement items based on user preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If manual review of replacement items is performed, then user satisfaction is improved, but the time required for processing orders increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser satisfactionVSAvoidorder processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine-learned language model performs self-service by automatically analyzing user comments and generating sentiment scores without human intervention. The system autonomously processes feedback, makes recommendations, and updates its models, eliminating the need for manual review while maintaining high user satisfaction standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review processes with an automated machine-learned language model that processes text data, generates sentiments, and makes recommendations. This substitution eliminates human labor time while improving consistency and speed of replacement item evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If existing replacement recommendation methods are used, then the system complexity is minimized, but the precision of sentiment analysis deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidsentiment analysis precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The machine-learned language model provides multi-functionality by handling multiple tasks: analyzing user comments, generating sentiment scores, identifying replacement items, and updating recommendations. This universal model consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate systems into a single integrated solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine-learned language model acts as an intermediary between raw user feedback and final replacement recommendations. It processes unstructured text comments, transforms them into structured sentiment data, and uses this intermediate representation to drive recommendation logic, improving precision without direct system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240378654A1Machine-learned large language model for sentiment analysis for curating replacements for an online system
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 MAPLEBEAR INC
  • US20240378654A1 patent drawing
  • US20240378654A1 patent drawing
  • US20240378654A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An online system determines whether to recommend a replacement item to a user based on a predicted sentiment score. The online system receives one or more comments from user feedback on the replacement items. The online system generates a prompt for each user comment for input to a machine-learned model. The online system generates a sentiment score for the ordered item and a replacement item based on the inferred sentiments by the model serving system. Using the sentiment score, the online system determines whether to recommend the replacement item.