SEO Control Group Analysis for Web Page Traffic Attribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for measuring the Return On Investment (ROI) of Search Engine Optimization (SEO) activities at scale are challenging due to the difficulty in isolating the impact of specific content improvements on web site traffic and revenue, especially when changes in user behavior and search engine algorithms occur, and existing solutions fail to accurately quantify the ROI of SEO improvements.

Innovation Solution

A system and process for control selection and analysis of SEO activities that involves selecting a test group and a control group of web pages, applying SEO content improvements to the test group, and monitoring user activities to determine the performance difference between the two groups, using automated SEO widgets and finite state machines to track visits, conversions, and revenue, while accounting for outliers and statistical significance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If SEO content improvements are applied to web pages, then organic search traffic and revenue are improved, but it becomes difficult to isolate and measure the specific impact of these improvements on traffic and revenue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorganic search trafficVSAvoidROI measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments web pages into test groups and control groups based on specific criteria (e.g., page type, traffic level, category). This segmentation allows for isolated measurement of SEO improvements by comparing test pages (with improvements) against control pages (without improvements), thereby resolving the measurement precision problem while maintaining productivity gains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If manual SEO optimization is performed on web pages, then search engine relevance is improved, but the process requires significant time and manual effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch engine relevanceVSAvoidmanual optimization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated SEO improvement activities that perform optimization tasks without manual intervention. The system automatically analyzes web pages, identifies optimization opportunities, and applies improvements based on predefined criteria and algorithms, thereby eliminating manual effort while maintaining or improving search engine relevance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters from manual to automated operations. By defining automated rules and algorithms for SEO improvements (such as automatic keyword optimization, meta tag generation, and content refinement), the system transforms the optimization process from time-intensive manual work to efficient automated parameter adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If SEO improvements are implemented across the entire web site, then overall web presence is improved, but it becomes difficult to determine which specific improvements are driving results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweb presenceVSAvoidattribution data
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the web site into multiple test and control groups with distinct characteristics. By applying SEO improvements only to test groups and maintaining control groups without improvements, the system preserves attribution data that identifies which specific improvements are driving results, while still achieving overall web presence enhancement across the segmented site.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces control groups as intermediaries between the test groups and the overall web site performance. These control groups serve as baseline references that enable the system to isolate and attribute performance changes to specific SEO improvements, thereby preventing loss of attribution information while maintaining improved web presence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10394796B1Control selection and analysis of search engine optimization activities for web sites
Publication Date: 2019.08.27 BLOOMREACH
  • US10394796B1 patent drawing
  • US10394796B1 patent drawing
  • US10394796B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for providing control selection and analysis of Search Engine Optimization (SEO) activities for web sites for web service providers are disclosed. In some embodiments, a system, process, and/or computer program product for providing control selection and analysis of SEO activities for web sites includes selecting a first plurality of web pages associated with a web site for use in a control group of web pages for an experiment; selecting a second plurality of web pages associated with the web site for use in a test group of web pages for the experiment; canonicalizing the control group of web pages and the test group of web pages; and performing the experiment to determine a performance of the test group of web pages relative to the control group of web pages. For example, the test group of web pages can be configured with an SEO content improvement activity.