Separable Floor Mat Design for Reduced Laundering Cost and Weight

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing commercial floor mats with an impervious rubber base layer face inefficiencies in laundering processes due to accelerated aging, weight, and bulk, leading to increased costs and safety hazards, while separable mats lack effective attachment mechanisms that ensure stability and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A floor mat design featuring a separable base and top layer with a secure interface mechanism, including cavities, notches, and magnets, allowing for easy assembly and disassembly, ensuring stability and breathability, and reducing the need for aggressive laundering processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a unitary rubber base layer is used to protect the floor, then floor protection is improved, but the mat weight and bulk increase, leading to safety hazards and increased laundering costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefloor protectionVSAvoidmat weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The mat is divided into two separate components: a reusable base layer that remains on the floor and a removable top layer that can be laundered independently. This segmentation allows the heavy base layer to stay stationary (eliminating transport weight issues) while only the lightweight top layer needs to be moved for laundering, directly resolving the contradiction between floor protection and mat weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If aggressive laundering processes are used to clean the mat, then cleaning effectiveness is improved, but the mat materials age faster and lose durability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning effectivenessVSAvoidmat durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the mat into a durable base layer and a removable top layer, the system allows the top layer to be laundered aggressively when needed while the base layer remains in place and is not subjected to aggressive laundering. This resolves the contradiction by enabling effective cleaning of the soiled portion without compromising the overall mat durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The top layer can be removed, laundered, and replaced without affecting the base layer. This allows the base layer to be recovered and reused indefinitely, while only the top layer undergoes aggressive laundering cycles, thus maintaining overall mat durability while ensuring cleaning effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Ease of operation

If the base layer is removed for laundering, then cleaning is improved, but transportation costs and energy consumption increase due to moving heavy bulk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning capabilityVSAvoidtransportation energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The mat system separates the heavy base layer (which stays in place) from the lightweight top layer (which is laundered). This segmentation eliminates the need to transport the heavy base layer for cleaning, reducing transportation energy consumption while maintaining full cleaning capability through the removable top layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The top layer is extracted as a separate removable component that can be laundered independently. This extraction allows cleaning to occur without moving the heavy base layer, thereby eliminating the energy loss associated with transporting the entire mat including the bulky base layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If a separable mat design is used to reduce weight, then ease of handling is improved, but attachment stability between layers deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling easeVSAvoidattachment stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical attachment systems (such as clips, snaps, or adhesives) with a magnetic attachment system. Magnets embedded in the base layer provide strong holding force to secure the top layer, ensuring attachment stability while maintaining the separable design that enables easy handling and removal for laundering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design provides a stable, breathable, and lightweight mat that reduces laundering costs and safety risks by allowing the base layer to remain in place, while the top layer can be easily exchanged, maintaining mat functionality and appearance.

Implementation Method 1

one of a variety of coupling features including, but not limited to, mechanical features, magnetic features, adhesive features, or a combination thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentEP3826513B1Deconstructed floor mat
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 CINTAS CORP SERVICES INC
  • EP3826513B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3826513B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3826513B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A multi-component floor mat has a base or frame layer, intended to be positioned on the floor, that is dimensioned to accommodate a flexible textile mat or rug top layer portion that is releasably held in place on or in the base or frame layer by an attachment coupling feature associated with one or both portions, thereby allowing for the easy removal or replacement of the textile top layer of the mat and its economical laundering.