Separable Structural Joiner for UAV Collision Load Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) face challenges in distributing collision impact forces across structural members, leading to concentrated damage at a single point, which can compromise the integrity and functionality of the vehicle.

Innovation Solution

A joiner mechanism that secures elongate structural members together, allowing them to separate upon exceeding a predetermined threshold force, distributing impact forces and limiting relative movement, while also incorporating impact attenuating tips to spread the force over a larger area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If structural members are rigidly connected to maintain structural integrity, then strength and rigidity are improved, but impact forces are concentrated at connection points causing damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidimpact force concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The joiner is divided into multiple separable portions (first portion and second portion) that can disconnect from each other. The coupling structures are designed to maintain connection during normal operation but allow separation when impact forces exceed a threshold, thereby segmenting the force transmission path and preventing force concentration at single connection points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The joiner transitions from a static rigid connection to a dynamic separable connection. The coupling structures include engagement surfaces that maintain rigid connection during normal flight but can disengage when subjected to excessive impact forces, allowing the structure to adapt its connectivity based on operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If separable coupling structures are implemented to distribute impact forces, then damage concentration is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact force distributionVSAvoidjoiner structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The coupling structures are designed as relatively simple mechanical elements with engagement surfaces that can be manufactured cost-effectively. The separable portions and coupling structures represent a deliberate design choice to use simpler, potentially replaceable components rather than complex permanently rigid connections, accepting that these elements may need replacement after impact events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If separable portions are designed to disconnect during impact, then impact force distribution is improved, but structural stability during normal operation may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision damageVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The coupling structures are pre-configured with engagement surfaces designed to maintain secure connection during normal flight operations. The geometry and positioning of these engagement surfaces are optimized beforehand to provide stable connection under typical operational loads, ensuring structural stability is maintained until impact forces exceed the designed threshold.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260021911A1Separable Joiner
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 WING AVIATION LLC
  • US20260021911A1 patent drawing
  • US20260021911A1 patent drawing
  • US20260021911A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A joiner includes a first and second portions configured to mount to respective first and second structural members. Each of the first and second portions includes a body with a receiving surface to receive the respective structural member. The first portion includes a group of first coupling structures disposed on the first body and the second portion includes a group of second coupling structures disposed on the second body. The first coupling structures are configured to mate with the second coupling structures such that engagement surfaces of the first coupling structures engage engagement surfaces of the second coupling structures so as to transfer loads between the second portion and first portion and to limit relative movement between the first portion and second portion with respect to the first direction and with respect to a vertical direction.