Power Converter with Separate Buck and Boost Circuits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional buck-boost converters have limitations in efficiency and operational range, as they share components for buck and boost functionalities, leading to restricted applications and narrow input/output voltage ranges.

Innovation Solution

A power converter with separate and independently controllable buck and boost conversion circuits, utilizing a control unit that samples input and output voltages and currents to adjust switching frequencies and duty cycles, allowing operation in both buck and boost modes over a wide range of voltages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional buck-boost converters share components for buck and boost functionalities, then device complexity is reduced, but efficiency and operational range are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational rangeVSAvoidcircuit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power converter is divided into separate buck conversion circuit and boost conversion circuit, each with independent switching devices. The buck circuit includes switching devices Q1-Q4 while the boost circuit includes switching devices Q5-Q8, allowing independent control and optimization of each conversion mode, thereby expanding operational range without compromising efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The power converter is designed to perform multiple functions through separate circuits - it can operate in buck mode when input voltage exceeds output voltage, in boost mode when input voltage is lower than output voltage, and in direct connection mode when voltages are equal, making it universally applicable across wide voltage ranges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If buck and boost functionalities share switching devices, then device complexity is reduced, but control flexibility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol flexibilityVSAvoidswitching devices
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The switching devices are segmented into two independent groups: Q1-Q4 for buck conversion and Q5-Q8 for boost conversion. Each group can be controlled independently by the control unit, enabling flexible switching between modes and independent optimization of duty cycles and switching frequencies for each circuit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit dynamically adjusts the operation mode by comparing input and output voltages and accordingly activating different switching device groups. The system can transition between buck mode, boost mode, and direct connection mode based on real-time voltage conditions, providing dynamic control flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of energy

If conventional buck-boost converters use shared components, then manufacturing is simpler, but efficiency over wide voltage range is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiencyVSAvoidcircuit components
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the conversion circuits into separate buck and boost paths with independent switching devices, each circuit can be optimized for its specific conversion mode, minimizing energy losses associated with component sharing and enabling high efficiency across both buck and boost operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit independently adjusts switching frequencies and duty cycles for each circuit based on operating conditions. When operating in buck mode, it optimizes parameters for the buck circuit; when in boost mode, it optimizes parameters for the boost circuit, thereby maintaining high conversion efficiency across wide voltage ranges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9350243B2Power converter with separate buck and boost conversion circuits
Publication Date: 2016.05.24 SIGNIFY HOLDING BV
  • US9350243B2 patent drawing
  • US9350243B2 patent drawing
  • US9350243B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus (100) includes a buck and boost conversion circuit (110), and a control unit (120, 200) for controlling operations of the buck and boost converter. The buck and boost converter includes a buck conversion circuit having a first set of switches (SW3, SW4), and a boost conversion circuit having a second set of switches (SW5, SW6). The buck conversion circuit and the boost conversion circuit may be controlled independently from each other. The control unit is configured to control delivery of power from the power converter to a load (20) via the buck conversion circuit in a buck conversion mode by controlling switching operations of the first set of switches, and to control the delivery of the power from the power converter to the load via the boost conversion circuit in a boost conversion mode by controlling switching operations of the second set of switches.