Separated PET Feedstock Recycling for Faster, Cleaner Depolymerization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing chemical recycling methods for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are energy inefficient, ecologically unfriendly, have low throughput, and produce degradation products that are difficult to remove, often requiring mixing with virgin PET to achieve high-quality recycled PET.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the separation of PET feedstock into two streams, each processed in separate reaction lines with varying process parameters, including contact with organic compounds to reduce molar mass and remove impurities, followed by combination of the resulting mixtures to produce a high-quality intermediate product.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If PET is depolymerised to monomers using conventional chemical recycling methods, then the PET can be recycled, but the process requires long depolymerisation times and produces large amounts of degradation products that cannot be removed from the recycled PET

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecycled PET qualityVSAvoiddepolymerisation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the feedstock into different particle size fractions (fine particles <1.0mm and coarser particles ≥1.0mm) and processes them through different reaction lines with optimized parameters. This segmentation allows each fraction to be depolymerized under conditions best suited to its characteristics, reducing overall degradation and processing time while improving recycled PET quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs different reaction parameters (temperature, residence time, catalyst amounts, organic compound ratios) for different particle size fractions. Fine particles receive different treatment than coarser particles, optimizing depolymerization efficiency for each fraction and minimizing degradation products that would otherwise require lengthy removal processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If conventional chemical recycling methods are used to recycle PET, then PET waste can be processed, but the process is very energy inefficient and ecologically unfriendly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecycling throughputVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the feedstock into particle size fractions and processing them through separate reaction lines with optimized parameters, the patent achieves more efficient depolymerization that requires less energy input per unit of PET recycled, while maintaining high throughput capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes reaction parameters including temperature profiles, residence times, and catalyst concentrations for different particle fractions, achieving faster depolymerization rates that reduce energy consumption while maintaining or increasing overall recycling productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If PET feedstock is processed to obtain high-quality recycled PET, then the product quality improves, but the process complexity increases and throughput decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecycled PET qualityVSAvoidrecycling throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments feedstock into particle size fractions and processes them through parallel reaction lines, which maintains throughput by handling multiple fractions simultaneously while achieving high quality through optimized individual processing of each fraction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the processing streams of different particle fractions after individual optimization, merging them into a unified output that maintains both high throughput (from parallel processing) and high quality (from optimized individual fraction treatment)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces degradation, variation in molar weight, and impurities, increases throughput, and enhances the purity and quality of the intermediate product, which can be used to produce high-quality PET polymers with reduced energy consumption and carbon footprint.

Implementation Method 1

contacting the first polyester with a further amount of a first organic compound... reducing a weight average molar mass of the first polyester

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS12624189B2Process for recycling polyethylene terephthalate using a separated feedstock
Publication Date: 2026.05.12 REVALYU RESOURCES GMBH
  • US12624189B2 patent drawing
  • US12624189B2 patent drawing
  • US12624189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One aspect is a method for producing a first intermediate product. A feedstock is provided that comprises a first polyester. The feedstock is separated into a least a first feedstock amount and a further feedstock amount. The first feedstock amount and the further feedstock amount comprise the first polyester.The first feedstock amount is transported into a first reaction line, and the further feedstock amount is transported into a further reaction line.In a reaction line the first polyester is contacted with a further amount of a first organic compound, a weight average molar mass of the first polyester is reduced;the first polyester is contacted with a further organic compound to obtain a further initial mixture;a weight average molar mass of the first polyester is reduced to obtain a first intermediate mixture. The first intermediate mixture comprisesa first intermediate product andthe further organic compound.At least one process parameter varies by at least 10%, between the first reaction line and the further reaction line.