Separator and stacker for textile articles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated laundry separation and stacking machines are often too slow, large, or prone to maintenance issues, making them inefficient and costly, while manual separation and stacking are also expensive.

Innovation Solution

A multi-stage process involving conveyors, clamps, and air nozzles to rotate, flatten, and stack textile articles, utilizing sensors and adjustable mechanisms to optimize the separation and stacking of textile articles in a compact and efficient manner.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated processes are used for separating and stacking textile articles, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation and stacking speedVSAvoidmachine structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated separation and stacking system is divided into distinct functional modules: a conveyor system for article transport, a clamp mechanism for gripping and positioning, and an air nozzle system for flattening. Each module operates independently but coordinates through a control system, allowing the complex automated process to be managed through modular components that can be maintained and adjusted separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The clamp mechanism serves multiple functions: it grips the textile article during conveyance, positions the article edge parallel to the conveyance direction through controlled rotation, and maintains holding pressure during the flattening process. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If existing automated machines are used, then productivity is improved, but maintenance problems increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated processing speedVSAvoidmaintenance frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The air nozzle system automatically flattens textile articles as they pass through the conveyor, eliminating the need for manual intervention or complex mechanical pressing mechanisms. The system uses readily available compressed air to perform the flattening function, reducing wear on mechanical components and minimizing maintenance requirements while maintaining high automated processing speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical flattening mechanisms with a pneumatic air nozzle system that directs airflow to flatten articles. This approach reduces mechanical wear and tear, eliminates the need for heavy-duty pressing components, and significantly decreases maintenance frequency while preserving automated productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

3Device complexity

If manual separation and stacking are used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing system simplicityVSAvoidseparation and stacking speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical operations with an automated conveyor-clamp-air nozzle mechanism. The conveyor provides continuous automated transport, the clamp delivers precise automated gripping and positioning, and the air nozzle performs automated flattening. This substitution of manual labor with coordinated automated mechanisms dramatically increases productivity while keeping the overall device structure relatively simple through the use of standard components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If automated machines are made larger, then processing capability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidmachine footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system utilizes the vertical dimension for the air nozzle flattening operation, directing airflow downward onto articles on the conveyor without requiring additional horizontal space. The clamp mechanism also operates vertically to grip and position articles, allowing the system to maintain high processing capacity within a compact horizontal footprint by exploiting vertical space for critical functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables faster, more efficient separation and stacking of textile articles, reducing operational costs and maintaining a compact machine size, while ensuring accurate processing and reduced maintenance needs.

Implementation Method 1

The article is held while part of the article rests on the conveyor. By conveying while held, the textile article rotates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

An air nozzle or blower directs air at a center of the article to flatten out the corners and assist in maintaining position on the stack during release of the edge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow:

Implementation Method 3

The article is dragged over a gap where gravity and blowing attempt to flatten the article if still folded

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS10407822B2Separator and stacker for textile articles
Publication Date: 2019.09.10 MCCABE STANLEY G
  • US10407822B2 patent drawing
  • US10407822B2 patent drawing
  • US10407822B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In laundry processing, a conveyor rotates a textile article in a first stage. The article is held while part of the article rests on the conveyor. By conveying while held, the textile article rotates, positioning an edge of the article. In a second stage, the conveyor conveys the article to a clamp. This clamp holds the article while the conveyor reverses direction and a blower attempts to flatten the article if folded. The textile article rotates, positioning the edge of the article to be more parallel with the direction of conveyance. In a third stage, the article is dragged by the edge over a gap where gravity and blowing attempt to flatten the article. In a fourth stage, the flattened article is positioned over a stack. A blower directs air at a center of the article to blow out the corners and assist in maintaining position.