Explosion-Protected Motor Housing for Separator Drives

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing separator drive systems lack an effective explosion-proof design, making them unsafe for use in hazardous areas, and previous solutions require additional inert gas encapsulation devices or complex pressure-resistant designs.

Innovation Solution

A direct drive system with a compact, flame-tight motor housing encapsulation, where the motor housing section only contains the stator and rotor, and the bearing is located between the drum and rotor, allowing for minimal lubrication and elastic support, with a single rotary feedthrough and optimized gap design to prevent flame spread.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional separator drive system is used, then the separator can operate, but it lacks explosion-proof design and is unsafe for hazardous areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexplosion-proof safetyVSAvoiddrive system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the motor housing with the separator housing to form a unified explosion-proof enclosure. The motor is integrated directly into the separator assembly, eliminating the need for separate drive components and reducing overall system complexity while maintaining explosion-proof integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an inert gas atmosphere as an intermediary medium between the motor components and the external hazardous environment. This inert atmosphere prevents flame propagation while allowing the motor to operate normally, achieving explosion-proof protection without complex mechanical barriers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If additional inert gas encapsulation devices are added to achieve explosion-proof design, then safety in hazardous areas is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexplosion-proof safetyVSAvoidencapsulation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inert gas encapsulation system is merged with the existing motor housing and separator housing, eliminating the need for separate encapsulation devices. The housing structure itself serves as the containment vessel for the inert atmosphere, reducing component count and simplifying the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The motor housing is designed to serve multiple functions: it provides mechanical support for the motor, contains the inert gas atmosphere for explosion-proof protection, and integrates with the separator housing. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for dedicated encapsulation devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If a flame-tight motor housing encapsulation is used, then flame spread is prevented, but the design complexity of the motor housing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame spread preventionVSAvoidmotor housing design
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor housing is merged with the separator housing to form a single integrated structure. This integration allows the housing to serve as both the motor enclosure and the explosion-proof barrier, eliminating the need for separate flame-tight enclosures and reducing design complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The housing design incorporates specific geometric parameters such as gap dimensions and flame path lengths that are optimized to prevent flame propagation. By carefully controlling these parameters, the housing achieves flame-tight protection without requiring complex additional components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Volume of moving object

If the bearing is located between the drum and rotor, then a compact design is achieved, but lubrication system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive system compactnessVSAvoidlubrication system
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lubrication system is merged with the inert gas encapsulation system, using the same housing structures and seals for both functions. This integration allows compact bearing placement while avoiding additional lubrication-specific components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The inert gas atmosphere serves as an intermediary medium that allows the bearing to be located in a compact position between the drum and rotor. The inert atmosphere provides both explosion-proof protection and a controlled environment for lubrication, eliminating the need for separate lubrication containment structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a compact, simple, and effective explosion-proof design that eliminates the need for additional inert gas devices, ensuring safety in hazardous areas by preventing flame spread and maintaining operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

only the motor housing section, which accommodates the motor with the stator and the rotor, is preferably designed to be flame-tightly encapsulated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlame-tight encapsulation: Physical Containment

Implementation Method 2

the entire drive unit, having at least the motor with stator and rotor and the motor housing section, is supported on a machine frame via a flange area by means of elastic elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic support: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2852466B1Drive apparatus for a separator arrangement
Publication Date: 2019.04.24 GEA MECHANICAL EQUIP GMBH
  • EP2852466B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2852466B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2852466B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3c

AI summary

Drive apparatus for a separator drum having a vertical rotation axis (D) and an inflow line for a material which is to be processed by centrifuging, wherein a drive spindle (2) for the centrifuge drum is provided, it being possible for said drive spindle to be rotated by means of a motor (20, 21) which is designed as a direct drive and has a stator (21) and a rotor (20), wherein the drive apparatus is arranged in a drive housing (4) which has a motor housing section (16) which is designed in the form of an explosion-protected structure that is encapsulated in a pressure-resistant manner and in which the motor comprising the stator (20) and the rotor (21) is accommodated.