Biological Sequence Labeling Using Positive and Negative Examples

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for labeling biological sequences, such as homology-based and machine learning-based approaches, struggle with sequences and labels not well represented in training data, leading to inaccurate labeling and high computational overhead.

Innovation Solution

A neural network system that processes input biological sequences alongside positive and negative examples to generate scores for candidate labels, leveraging similarity-based selection of sequences to implicitly identify complex patterns and reduce computational resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If homology-based or traditional machine learning methods are used for labeling biological sequences, then the approach can handle sequences well-represented in training data, but it leads to inaccurate labeling and high computational overhead for sequences not well-represented in training data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling accuracyVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the labeling task by separately identifying positive sequences (those with the candidate label) and negative sequences (those without the candidate label). This segmentation allows the model to process each type of sequence independently, improving both accuracy and computational efficiency by focusing on relevant examples rather than processing all sequences uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-identifying and storing positive and negative sequence examples for each candidate label during a training phase. This preliminary preparation enables the model to quickly retrieve and compare relevant sequences during inference, reducing computational overhead while maintaining high labeling accuracy for sequences not well-represented in the original training data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional machine learning approaches are used, then the system can process biological sequences, but it struggles with sequences and labels not well represented in training data leading to inaccurate labeling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneralizability to unseen sequencesVSAvoidlabeling accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism by using identified positive and negative sequences as mediators between the input sequence and the labeling decision. These intermediary sequences serve as reference points that help the model generalize to unseen sequences while maintaining accurate labeling, effectively bridging the gap between training data and new sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs copying by creating representative copies of positive and negative sequences that capture the essential characteristics of each class. These copied sequences are then used as templates for comparison with new input sequences, enabling the model to generalize accurately to sequences not well-represented in the original training data while maintaining labeling precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If ensemble methods are used to improve prediction accuracy, then labeling precision may improve, but computational resources and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential elements needed for accurate labeling by identifying and using only positive and negative sequence examples for each candidate label. This extraction approach achieves high prediction accuracy without the need for complex ensemble methods, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining or improving labeling precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250364079A1Predicting labels for biological sequences using neural networks conditioned on positive and negative examples
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 DEEPMIND TECH LTD
  • US20250364079A1 patent drawing
  • US20250364079A1 patent drawing
  • US20250364079A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for predicting labels for biological sequences. One of the methods includes, in response to receiving a request to identify labels associated with an input biological sequence: determining, for each of a plurality of candidate labels, a score characterizing a likelihood that the input biological sequence is associated with the candidate label. Each score is determined by identifying a plurality of positive biological sequences that are each associated with the candidate label; and processing a network input including the input biological sequence and the plurality of positive biological sequences using a neural network to generate the score characterizing the likelihood that the input biological sequence is associated with the candidate label. The method includes selecting one or more of the candidate labels as labels for the input biological sequence based on the scores.