Sequenced Message Streams for ACID Distributed Transactions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Implementing ACID compliant transactions in distributed computing systems, particularly distributed databases, is challenging due to the complexity and inefficiencies of existing techniques like the Saga design pattern and Two-Phase Commit protocol.

Innovation Solution

A system with a sequencer that communicates an atomic message sequence to multiple service instances, each processing messages through a local queue and executing a state machine to manage distributed transactions, ensuring ACID compliance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the Saga design pattern or Two-Phase Commit protocol is used to implement ACID compliant transactions in distributed systems, then transaction consistency is ensured, but system complexity and processing overhead increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveACID transaction complianceVSAvoidtransaction processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a sequencer as an intermediary component that receives transaction requests, assigns sequence numbers, and broadcasts ordered transaction logs to all service instances. This mediator simplifies the transaction coordination by centralizing the ordering logic, eliminating the need for complex two-phase commit protocols while maintaining ACID properties through sequential consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The sequencer performs preliminary actions by pre-assigning sequence numbers to transaction logs before they are executed by service instances. This preliminary ordering of transactions ensures that all service instances process transactions in the same sequence without requiring complex coordination during execution, reducing processing overhead while maintaining consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If distributed databases are implemented with multiple service instances for redundancy, then fault tolerance is improved, but message ordering and consistency across instances become more difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault toleranceVSAvoidmessage ordering complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sequencer serves multiple functions: it assigns sequence numbers, orders transaction logs, broadcasts messages to all service instances, and maintains a global transaction log. This universal component handles all ordering and coordination tasks centrally, allowing multiple service instances to maintain identical state without complex peer-to-peer coordination mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

All service instances are designed to be homogeneous, receiving the same ordered transaction logs from the sequencer and executing identical operations in the same sequence. This homogeneity ensures that regardless of how many instances exist or which fail, the surviving instances maintain consistent state without requiring complex reconciliation protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

3Reliability

If existing two-phase commit protocols are used for distributed transactions, then atomicity is ensured, but processing time and system performance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction atomicityVSAvoidtransaction processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the transaction processing into independent, sequential operations where each service instance processes its assigned transactions independently according to the global sequence. This eliminates the need for synchronous two-phase commit coordination between instances, allowing parallel processing while maintaining atomicity through the sequential log execution model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each service instance autonomously processes transactions by reading from the ordered transaction log and executing operations locally without requiring coordination with other instances. The sequencer's pre-established message order ensures atomicity is maintained automatically, allowing service instances to operate independently and improve processing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12561312B2Distributed stream-based acid transactions
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 NASDAQ INC
  • US12561312B2 patent drawing
  • US12561312B2 patent drawing
  • US12561312B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for processing distributed transactions is provided. The system includes a sequencer that communicates an atomic message stream to multiple different service instances. The service instances each process the messages from the message stream into a local queue. Each service instance also executes a state machine by reading messages from a queue and transitioning between states in the state machine while also performing one or more operations in connection with performing a distributed transaction.