Sequencing-Based Column Detection for Demographic Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual review and reformatting of demographic data from healthcare providers is time-consuming and expensive, contributing significantly to administrative overhead costs, with responses often having poor formatting, inconsistent headings, and inaccurate information.

Innovation Solution

A system and method using a machine learning model to analyze demographic data files, applying a nonlinear optimization algorithm to identify correct column labels, and a combination of machine learning algorithms and rules to efficiently reformat the data, reducing resource consumption and improving accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual review and reformatting methods are used, then data accuracy can be verified, but the process is time-consuming and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

A machine learning model is introduced as an intermediary between the raw demographic data and the final formatted output. The model automatically identifies column labels, validates data formats, and reformatting responses, replacing manual human review while maintaining accuracy through algorithmic validation rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of human reviewers examining and reformatting data is replaced with an automated computational system. The system uses machine learning algorithms to detect patterns, validate data quality, and perform reformatting operations automatically, eliminating the need for human time investment while preserving accuracy through programmed validation criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual review methods are used, then data quality can be verified, but administrative overhead costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata qualityVSAvoidadministrative overhead costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-validation through automated machine learning models that independently assess data quality, identify formatting issues, and correct errors without requiring human intervention. The model serves itself by automatically detecting and resolving data quality problems, eliminating the need for expensive manual administrative review while maintaining reliable data quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Expensive manual administrative review processes are replaced with cost-effective automated machine learning systems. The computational infrastructure processes and validates data quality at a fraction of the cost of human labor, while programmed validation rules ensure reliable data quality outcomes comparable to or exceeding manual review standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated processing is implemented, then efficiency improves, but handling of inconsistent formats and unknown structures becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidhandling of inconsistent formats
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model is designed to be dynamic and adaptive, automatically adjusting to different data formats, structures, and conventions encountered in the demographic responses. The model learns from training data to recognize various formatting patterns and adapts its validation and reformatting rules accordingly, enabling efficient processing of inconsistent and unknown data structures without sacrificing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes its processing parameters and validation rules based on the detected data format and structure. When encountering inconsistent formats, the model adjusts its column detection algorithms, validation thresholds, and reformatting parameters to accommodate the specific data characteristics, maintaining high processing efficiency across diverse input formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12443614B2Efficient column detection using sequencing, and applications thereof
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 H1 INSIGHTS INC
  • US12443614B2 patent drawing
  • US12443614B2 patent drawing
  • US12443614B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to systems and methods for identifying demographic information in a data file. The method uses evidence for a label within the column itself. In addition, the method uses likelihoods that a first label may exist at a particular location in a data file with respect to a second label. Finally, the method uses likelihoods that a first label exists in the data file at a first frequency given that a second label exists in a data file in a second frequency. All based on these likelihoods, an overall likelihood of that the label configuration is correct is determined. Using that likelihood score, a nonlinear optimization algorithm is applied to identify a best fit between a group of labels and a group of columns in a data file.