Sequencing Base Calling With Two-Stage Phasing and Prephasing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sequencing technologies face challenges in accurately correcting phasing and prephasing errors in DNA sequencing, leading to reduced accuracy in base calling due to unsynchronized sequencing signals from clustered DNA fragments.

Innovation Solution

A two-stage correction process utilizing phasing and prephasing information from previous and subsequent sequencing cycles, combined with penalty functions, to correct image intensities in polonies or clusters, allowing for accurate base calling even in low or unbalanced diversity samples.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If phasing and prephasing correction is performed using existing methods, then base calling accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases and processing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebase calling accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The correction process is divided into distinct stages: estimating phasing/prephasing parameters from current cycle data, applying corrections using these parameters, and optionally refining with subsequent cycle information. This segmentation allows the complex correction task to be broken into manageable computational steps, reducing overall complexity while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method performs preliminary estimation of phasing and prephasing parameters using only current cycle data before applying corrections. This preliminary action enables the system to address the majority of synchronization errors without requiring complex iterative processing of multiple cycles, thereby reducing computational burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If phasing and prephasing correction uses multiple sequencing cycles, then correction accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary correction using current cycle data immediately, providing timely base calling results. Subsequent cycle information is then used to refine these corrections, allowing the system to deliver accurate results without waiting for complete multi-cycle data accumulation, thus reducing processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The method uses feedback from subsequent sequencing cycles to refine initial correction estimates. After preliminary base calling is performed using current cycle data, information from subsequent cycles feeds back to adjust and improve the correction accuracy, achieving high precision without excessive processing delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If existing phasing correction methods are applied, then synchronization errors are reduced, but the method fails to handle low diversity samples effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization correction reliabilityVSAvoidsample diversity adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The method dynamically adjusts correction parameters based on the observed diversity characteristics of the sequencing sample. For low diversity samples, the algorithm modifies its parameter estimation approach to account for limited base variation, ensuring reliable correction across diverse sample types without requiring sample-specific preprocessing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The correction method is designed to universally handle different sample diversity levels through a unified algorithmic framework. By incorporating adaptive parameter estimation that works with both high and low diversity samples, the system achieves multi-functionality without requiring separate correction protocols for different sample types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250285709A1Phasing and prephasing correction of base calling in next generation sequencing
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 ELEMENT BIOSCIENCES INC
  • US20250285709A1 patent drawing
  • US20250285709A1 patent drawing
  • US20250285709A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure includes methods, systems, and media for performing a phasing and prephasing correction in sequencing analysis, comprising: determining corrected image intensities of a plurality of polonies, Ipc(N), based on a cycle N−1 phasing coefficient, pN−1, a cycle N−1 prephasing coefficient, ppN−1, or both; obtaining base calls in the cycle N based on the corrected image intensities of the plurality of polonies in the cycle N, Ipc(N); selecting, by the processor, polonies from the plurality of polonies based on the base calls; determining a cycle N phasing coefficient, pN, a cycle N prephasing coefficient, ppN, or both; and updating image intensities of the plurality of polonies in cycle N, I(N), using updated and corrected image intensities, Ipc_n(N), wherein Ipc_n(N) is obtained based on the cycle N phasing coefficient, pN, the cycle N prephasing coefficient, ppN, or both.