Sequential Deformable Mirrors for High-Contrast Exoplanet Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current active optical beam shaping systems struggle to achieve high contrast in imaging exoplanets due to the degrading effects of secondary support structures and segmented apertures, which limit the contrast achievable by existing coronagraphs, especially in future Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs) with asymmetric apertures.

Innovation Solution

An active optical beam shaping system utilizing two sequential deformable mirrors and a signal processing and control system to shape the optical beam, providing a large amplitude light modulation range and constant phase delay profile, effectively mitigating the impact of aperture discontinuities and secondary support structures by remapping the pupil discontinuities and compensating for wavefront errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional coronagraphs are used with secondary support structures, then the system is easier to manufacture, but the contrast is degraded by a factor of 100

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecontrastVSAvoidaperture structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the beam shaping function across two separate deformable mirrors rather than using a single complex mirror or traditional coronagraph. The first DM handles amplitude modulation while the second DM handles phase correction, dividing the difficult task of achieving 10^-8 contrast with obscured apertures into two more manageable functions that can be implemented with commercially available deformable mirror technology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses dynamically cont deformable mirrors that can change their surface shape in real-time through electrostatic actuation. This dynamic capability allows the system to adapt to different aperture configurations and continuously optimize beam shaping, unlike static traditional coronagraphs that are fixed for specific aperture geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If single deformable mirror is used for beam shaping, then the device complexity is reduced, but the amplitude light modulation range is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of deformable mirrorsVSAvoidamplitude light modulation range
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the beam shaping function into two segments performed by two separate deformable mirrors. The first DM is dedicated to amplitude modulation with large stroke capability, while the second DM handles phase correction. This segmentation allows each mirror to be optimized for its specific function, achieving a total amplitude modulation range that neither mirror could achieve alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the functions of two deformable mirrors in sequence to achieve capabilities greater than the sum of individual mirrors. By placing the mirrors in series with appropriate spacing, the system merges amplitude modulation and phase correction into a unified beam shaping system that achieves 10^-8 contrast levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of manufacture

If coronagraphs are optimized for circularly symmetric apertures, then the design is simpler, but the contrast is degraded by secondary support structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoronagraph designVSAvoidcontrast
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent embraces asymmetric aperture configurations including central obscuration and secondary support structures rather than trying to eliminate them. The dual deformable mirror system is specifically designed to compensate for these asymmetric features, using the first DM to reshape the pupil function and the second DM to correct resulting phase errors, achieving high contrast despite the asymmetric geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the key parameter of beam shaping from fixed geometric masks to dynamically controllable deformable mirror surfaces. This allows the system to adapt to different aperture configurations and maintain high contrast performance across various telescope designs, including those with significant central obscuration and support structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If phase mask technology is used, then the contrast can be improved, but chromatic properties are not fully characterized

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecontrastVSAvoidchromatic performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces static phase mask technology with dynamically controllable deformable mirrors. Instead of relying on fixed refractive or diffractive phase elements with uncertain chromatic behavior, the system uses electrostatically actuated mirror surfaces that can be precisely controlled across broad spectral bands, eliminating chromatic aberrations through active wavefront correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses dynamically adjustable deformable mirrors that can adapt to different wavelengths in real-time, providing reliable broadband performance. Unlike static phase masks that have fixed chromatic characteristics, the deformable mirrors can be controlled to maintain optimal performance across wide spectral ranges, ensuring reliable chromatic behavior for exoplanet imaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves a significant improvement in contrast, reaching levels comparable to state-of-the-art Ex-AO instruments, with contrasts below 10^-8, and demonstrates the ability to operate over a broad spectral bandwidth, enhancing the capability for direct imaging of exoplanets and mitigating chromatic diffractive artifacts.

Implementation Method 1

a first deformable mirror arranged to at least partially intercept an entrance beam of light and to provide a first reflected beam of light, a second deformable mirror arranged to at least partially intercept the first reflected beam of light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS9140896B2Active beam shaping system and method using sequential deformable mirrors
Publication Date: 2015.09.22 JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • US9140896B2 patent drawing
  • US9140896B2 patent drawing
  • US9140896B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An active optical beam shaping system includes a first deformable mirror arranged to at least partially intercept an entrance beam of light and to provide a first reflected beam of light, a second deformable mirror arranged to at least partially intercept the first reflected beam of light from the first deformable mirror and to provide a second reflected beam of light, and a signal processing and control system configured to communicate with the first and second deformable mirrors. The first deformable mirror, the second deformable mirror and the signal processing and control system together provide a large amplitude light modulation range to provide an actively shaped optical beam.