Sequential Valve Gating With Flow-Front Feedback in Injection Molding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Injection molding systems with sequential valve gating face challenges in synchronizing the opening of multiple gates to ensure a smooth flow stream, leading to air bubbles or surface defects in molded parts due to reliance on preset timing or screw position, which requires highly experienced operators and is not adaptable to viscosity changes.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that utilize flow front detection coupled with position sensors to automatically adjust the timing of valve pin withdrawal, allowing for continuous optimization of the sequential valve gating process by determining adjusted instruction times based on delays between predetermined and actual open gate times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If preset time or screw position is used to control valve pin withdrawal, then the system is simple to operate, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inability to adapt to viscosity changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate opening timing precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses flow front detection sensors to provide real-time feedback on melt arrival at the cavity. This feedback loop allows the control system to automatically adjust valve pin withdrawal timing based on actual flow conditions rather than relying on preset times or screw positions, thereby improving gate opening timing precision while adapting to viscosity changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical timing methods (preset timers and screw position sensing) with an optical/electrical detection system. Flow front detection sensors detect the actual arrival of melt at the cavity, providing more accurate timing information that substitutes for less precise mechanical timing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If preset time or screw position is used to control valve pin withdrawal, then the device complexity is low, but the adaptability deteriorates due to inability to adjust to viscosity changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to viscosity changesVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow front detection sensors provide continuous feedback on melt flow status, enabling the control system to adapt to viscosity changes automatically. When viscosity changes affect flow speed, the sensors detect the altered flow front arrival time and the system adjusts valve pin withdrawal timing accordingly, providing adaptability without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static, preset timing to dynamic, real-time adjustment. The valve pin withdrawal timing is no longer fixed but dynamically adjusted based on actual flow conditions detected by sensors, allowing the system to adapt to changing viscosity and flow characteristics during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If sequential valve gating with multiple gates is used, then the productivity is improved for large scale parts, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates due to air bubbles or surface defects from poor flow coalescence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Flow front detection sensors monitor the arrival of melt at different locations in the cavity, providing feedback on flow progression. This enables precise control of sequential gate opening to ensure that flows from multiple gates coalesce properly, preventing air bubbles and surface defects while maintaining the productivity benefits of multi-gate injection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic, real-time adjustment of gate opening sequences based on actual flow front detection. Rather than relying on fixed timing schedules, the system adapts gate opening timing to actual flow conditions, ensuring optimal flow coalescence and surface quality while maintaining efficient multi-gate filling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11752673B2Injection molding apparatus and method for automatic cycle to cycle cavity injection
Publication Date: 2023.09.12 SYNVENTIVE MOLDING SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11752673B2 patent drawing
  • US11752673B2 patent drawing
  • US11752673B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An injection molding system comprising:a first selected valve,one or more downstream valves, delivering a fluid to a mold cavity,at least one fluid property sensor that detects a flow front of fluid material flowing downstream through the mold cavity at a trigger location within the cavity disposed between the first gate and at least one selected downstream gate,a controller instructing an actuator associated with the downstream gates to open the gates at a predetermined open gate target time on a first injection cycle,each valve associated with a position sensor that detects opening of a gate at an actual open gate time to the controller,the controller automatically adjusting time of instruction to open the gates on a subsequent injection cycle by an adjustment time equal to any delay in time between the predetermined open gate target time and the actual open gate time.