Sequential Two-Stage Ethanol Fermentation Process

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current ethanol production methods from lignocellulosic biomass face challenges such as high risk of contamination and longer hydrolysis times due to high sugar concentrations and enzyme inhibition, which limit ethanol yield and productivity.

Innovation Solution

A process involving sequential saccharification and co-fermentation using cellulase enzymes from two different sources, where the first enzyme is added during initial fermentation at 30-37°C, followed by a second enzyme at elevated temperature for hydrolysis, and then cooling for secondary fermentation, optimizing conditions for C5 and C6 sugar conversion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) is used, then reaction time is reduced and contamination risk is minimized, but ethanol inhibits enzymatic hydrolysis and optimal conditions for both processes cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction timeVSAvoidethanol inhibition on enzymatic hydrolysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process into two sequential stages: first stage performs saccharification at 50°C to convert cellulose to sugars, then second stage performs fermentation at 30°C to convert sugars to ethanol. This segmentation allows each process to occur under its optimal conditions without mutual interference, resolving the contradiction between reaction time reduction and ethanol inhibition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs saccharification as a preliminary action before fermentation. By first converting cellulose to fermentable sugars at 50°C, then subsequently performing fermentation at 30°C, the process ensures that enzymatic hydrolysis occurs without ethanol inhibition, while still achieving high productivity through the sequential optimization of both stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) is used, then optimal conditions for enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation can be achieved, but hydrolysis time increases and contamination risk increases due to long reaction time and high sugar concentration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenzyme inhibition by sugarsVSAvoidhydrolysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the advantages of both SSF and SHF by implementing a sequential two-stage process that combines the optimal condition separation of SHF with the time efficiency of SSF. The process achieves optimal temperatures for each stage while maintaining a compact overall timeline through continuous operation without extended idle periods between stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes temperature parameters between stages: maintaining 50°C during saccharification for optimal enzymatic activity, then reducing to 30°C for fermentation. This parameter change allows each process to proceed under its optimal conditions while the sequential design prevents the contamination risks associated with prolonged exposure to high sugar concentrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If high enzyme loading is used during enzymatic hydrolysis, then sugar yield increases, but cost increases and enzyme inhibition by end-products occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesugar yieldVSAvoidenzyme inhibition by end-products
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains continuous useful action by immediately fermenting the produced sugars in the second stage. This continuous removal of end-products (sugars) prevents enzyme inhibition while maintaining high sugar yield, as the fermentation process continuously consumes the sugars as they are produced during saccharification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces reaction time, minimizes enzyme usage, and achieves higher ethanol yields of 2.0%-5.0% (W/V) within 48 hours by targeting C5 and C6 sugars sequentially, improving productivity and reducing contamination risks.

Implementation Method 1

enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzymatic hydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 2

first cellulase enzyme, co-fermenting microorganism, nutrient in the fermentor at 30-37° C. for a period of 16 to 24 hours; adding second cellulase enzyme

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCellulase enzyme action: Enzyme

Implementation Method 3

preferentially fermenting mainly C5 sugars by incubating the pretreated lignocellulosic biomass of step (i) with first cellulase enzyme, co-fermenting microorganism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFermentation: Fermentation

Implementation Method 4

incubating the pretreated lignocellulosic biomass of step (i) with first cellulase enzyme, co-fermenting microorganism, nutrient in the fermentor at 30-37° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal control: Heating

Implementation Method 5

adding second cellulase enzyme to the fermentation broth of step (ii) and increasing the temperature to 45-55° C. for hydrolysis; allowing the fermentation broth of step (iii) to cool to a temperature of 35-38° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature optimization: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11193146B2Process for second generation ethanol production
Publication Date: 2021.12.07 INDIAN OIL CORP LTD
  • US11193146B2 patent drawing
  • US11193146B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to an improved method of second generation ethanol production from a lignocellulosic biomass. The process comprises subjecting a slurry of pre-treated lignocellulosic biomass comprising C5 and C6 sugars in a fermentor; preferentially fermenting mainly C5 sugars by incubating the pretreated lignocellulosic biomass of step (i) with first cellulase enzyme, co-fermenting microorganism, nutrient in the fermentor at 30-37° C. for a period of 16 to 24 hours; adding second cellulase enzyme to the fermentation broth of step (ii) and increasing the temperature to 45-55° C. for hydrolysis; allowing the fermentation broth of step (iii) to cool to a temperature of 35-38° C.; and preferentially fermenting C6 sugars by incubating the broth of step (iv) with a second dose of co-fermenting microorganism for a period of 6-8 hours to obtain ethanol. The process results in high ethanol productivity in shortest duration of time.