SerDes Receiver CDR Pulse Shaping with Decoupled ISI Equalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional SerDes architectures face limitations in coupling between clock data recovery (CDR) and equalization adaptation, leading to sub-optimal CDR locking points and sensitivity to transmitter settings, with FFE dominant architectures being noise-sensitive due to limited postcursor ISI correction and error propagation in DFE.

Innovation Solution

A SerDes receiver architecture integrating a Decision Feedforward Equalizer (DFFE) for both precursor and postcursor ISI correction, decoupling CDR and equalization adaptations, and using a multi-tap DFFE topology to achieve symmetric pulse responses and robust performance across a wide range of transmitter settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If FFE is used for ISI correction, then both precursor and postcursor ISI can be corrected, but noise and crosstalk are amplified

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveISI correction capabilityVSAvoidnoise amplification
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The equalization function is segmented into two distinct components: FFE for precursor ISI correction and DFE for postcursor ISI correction. This segmentation allows each equalizer type to operate in its optimal regime, with FFE handling precursor interference without excessive noise amplification and DFE handling postcursor interference without error propagation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines FFE and DFE into a hybrid equalization architecture where both equalizers work together in sequence. The FFE output feeds into the DFE, creating a unified equalization system that leverages the strengths of both approaches while mitigating their individual weaknesses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If DFE is used for postcursor ISI correction, then noise is not amplified, but error propagation occurs and it cannot correct precursor ISI

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise amplification avoidanceVSAvoiderror propagation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The equalization task is divided between FFE and DFE, with DFE specifically assigned to postcursor ISI correction where it excels at noise preservation. The segmentation ensures DFE operates only in its strength zone without attempting precursor correction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The DFE uses feedback from previously decided symbols to cancel postcursor ISI. The feedback mechanism allows DFE to use past decision information to improve current symbol detection without amplifying noise, while the hybrid architecture with FFE prevents error propagation by providing a clean reference signal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple taps of FFE are used for ISI correction, then both precursor and postcursor ISI are corrected, but complexity increases and noise is boosted

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveISI correction performanceVSAvoidequalizer complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The multi-tap equalization is segmented into FFE taps for precursor correction and DFE taps for postcursor correction. This segmentation reduces the total number of FFE taps needed, thereby reducing complexity and noise amplification while maintaining comprehensive ISI correction capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using many FFE taps for all ISI correction, the patent uses a limited number of FFE taps for precursor correction and relies on DFE for postcursor correction. This partial action approach optimizes the balance between complexity and performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Adaptability or versatility

If CDR and equalization are coupled, then joint adaptation is achieved, but CDR locking point becomes sub-optimal and sensitive to transmitter settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint adaptation capabilityVSAvoidCDR locking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The adaptation process is segmented into equalization adaptation and CDR adaptation that operate independently. The equalization adapts FFE and DFE coefficients to minimize ISI, while CDR adapts the clock recovery separately. This segmentation decouples the two adaptation processes, allowing CDR to achieve optimal locking points independent of transmitter settings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12074737B2SerDes receiver with optimized CDR pulse shaping
Publication Date: 2024.08.27 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US12074737B2 patent drawing
  • US12074737B2 patent drawing
  • US12074737B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optimized pulse shaping clock data recovery system is provided that includes a slicer configured to receive a signal and provide an initial set of tentative decisions to a decision feedforward equalizer, where the decision feedforward equalizer provides a fully equalized output signal. The slicer may be incorporated as part of decision feedback equalizer to provide better quality tentative decisions. The clock data recovery system also receives the first output signal that is partially equalized in such a way as to optimally shape it for a clock to sample it at an ideal location by providing an adjustment signal to the analog to digital controller.