SerDes Transmitter Self-Test Using M/N PLL Sampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for testing digital communication transmitter circuits require a full receiver, which is not feasible for die-to-die communication before the transmitter and receiver are coupled, leading to inefficiencies in testing and potential missed data paths.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a phase-lock loop (PLL) with an M/N phase-lock loop to generate an asynchronous sample clock signal, allowing the transmitter to test itself by sampling and error-checking a predetermined data pattern without a receiver, enabling at-speed testing and reducing power/area requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a full receiver is used to test the transmitter, then data transmission accuracy can be verified, but power consumption and area requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential testing functionality from a full receiver by implementing a simplified loop-back mechanism that routes transmitted data back to the transmitter input. This allows verification of data transmission accuracy without requiring complete receiver functionality, thereby reducing power consumption while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The transmitter is designed to perform both its primary function of data transmission and its secondary function of self-testing using the same hardware components. By routing the transmitted data back through the physical interface and using the transmitter's own reception capability for self-verification, the system achieves multi-functionality without additional power-hungry receiver components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If a full receiver is used to test the transmitter, then all data paths can be covered, but the device area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata path coverageVSAvoiddevice area
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential testing functionality from a full receiver by implementing a simplified loop-back mechanism that routes transmitted data back to the transmitter input. This allows verification of data transmission accuracy without requiring complete receiver functionality, thereby reducing power consumption while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The transmitter is designed to perform both its primary function of data transmission and its secondary function of self-testing using the same hardware components. By routing the transmitted data back through the physical interface and using the transmitter's own reception capability for self-verification, the system achieves multi-functionality without additional power-hungry receiver components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If testing is performed before transmitter and receiver are coupled, then testing efficiency improves, but the test setup becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidtest setup complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the testing functionality with the transmitter's existing hardware by implementing a loop-back mechanism that uses the same physical interface and internal components. This eliminates the need for separate test equipment and complex external test setups, allowing efficient pre-coupling testing while maintaining simple system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The transmitter performs self-testing by routing its own transmitted data back to its input and comparing it with the expected data pattern. This self-service capability eliminates the need for external test equipment and complex test setups, thereby improving testing efficiency while reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables effective self-testing of transmitters without a receiver, ensuring data transmission accuracy and covering all data paths, while reducing power and area usage by eliminating the need for a loop-back receiver.

Implementation Method 1

an M/N phase-lock loop to generate an asynchronous sample clock signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase-lock loop:

Implementation Method 2

The M/N PLL divides the reference clock signal by N and multiplies by M to generate the sample clock signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectClock signal division and multiplication:

Data Source

PatentUS11165554B1Transmitter test using phase-lock loop
Publication Date: 2021.11.02 CADENCE DESIGN SYST INC
  • US11165554B1 patent drawing
  • US11165554B1 patent drawing
  • US11165554B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments provide for testing a transmitter using a phase-lock loop, which can be used with a circuit for data communications, such as serializer/deserializer (SerDes) communications. In particular, some embodiments provide for data transmission test of a transmitter by: generating and outputting a pre-determined data pattern through a serializer of the transmitter; sampling a serialized data output of the serializer using a sample clock signal generated by an M/N phase-lock loop (PLL); and using a pattern checker to error check the sampled data to determine whether the data transmission test passes.