Serial Receiver AFE Gain Calibration Using DFE Zeroth Tap

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Variations in manufacturing processes result in significant variations in Analog Front End (AFE) gain from chip to chip, leading to potential saturation of circuits and bit errors in serial links, necessitating a method to set the AFE gain effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for setting the gain of an analog front end in a serial receiver, involving a first analog front end with adjustable DC gain, a data slicer, an error slicer, and a processor unit that iteratively adjusts the DC gain and estimates the zeroth channel tap value using the equation h0(n+1) = h0(n) + mu * Error * Data, ensuring the gain is within a set range to avoid saturation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manufacturing processes are used to produce AFE circuits, then production volume is increased, but gain variation between chips increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction volumeVSAvoidgain variation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the DC gain parameter of the AFE circuit dynamically through iterative adjustment. By modifying the gain parameter from an fixed manufacturing-determined value to an adjustable parameter that can be tuned during operation, the system compensates for manufacturing variations while maintaining high production volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the receiver monitors signal quality and iteratively adjusts the AFE DC gain based on the received signal characteristics. This closed-loop feedback system automatically compensates for gain variations between chips without requiring precise manufacturing control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If AFE gain is increased to improve signal reception, then signal quality is improved, but circuit saturation occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidcircuit saturation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the AFE DC gain dynamic rather than static. The gain is continuously adjusted during operation based on signal conditions, allowing the system to optimize signal quality while automatically preventing saturation by reducing gain when signal levels become too high.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The DC gain parameter is changed iteratively during operation to find the optimal value. By treating gain as a variable parameter that can be adjusted in real-time rather than a fixed manufacturing parameter, the system avoids both signal quality degradation and circuit saturation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If AFE gain is decreased to avoid saturation, then circuit stability is improved, but signal quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit stabilityVSAvoidsignal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic gain adjustment where the AFE DC gain adapts to signal conditions. This allows the system to maintain circuit stability by preventing saturation while simultaneously preserving signal quality through iterative optimization of the gain parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback mechanism monitors both signal quality and saturation conditions, adjusting the DC gain to achieve the optimal balance. The iterative process finds the gain value that maintains stability while maximizing signal quality, avoiding the trade-off present in fixed-gain systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If iterative DC gain adjustment is implemented, then gain precision is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegain precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-adjusting system where the receiver automatically performs iterative DC gain adjustment without external intervention. The system uses its own received signal to determine the optimal gain setting, eliminating the need for complex external calibration equipment or manual adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The iterative gain adjustment mechanism serves multiple functions: it compensates for manufacturing variations, optimizes signal quality, prevents saturation, and adapts to different channel conditions. This multi-functional approach achieves high gain precision without requiring separate systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3226498B1System and method for setting analog front end DC gain
Publication Date: 2020.07.08 SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD
  • EP3226498B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3226498B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3226498B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

A system and method for setting analog front end in a serial receiver. The serial receiver includes a decision feedback equalizer. During initialization, taps of the decision feedback equalizer other than the zeroth tap are disabled, and the zeroth tap is used to estimate the amplitude of the signal at the output of the analog front end. The analog front end gain is iteratively adjusted until the estimated value of the zeroth tap is within a set range.