Serpentine Cable Guide Structure for Multi-Pivot Cable Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cable guides are complex, inflexible, and inefficient in managing tensile and compressive forces when cables are routed over multiple pivot points, leading to cable damage and entanglement, especially in scenarios with limited structural space.

Innovation Solution

A cable guide system comprising a fastening structure and multiple guide ducts with serpentine curve-shaped segments that can compress and expand to accommodate tensile and compressive forces, allowing cables to be routed in a wave shape between pivot points, distributing forces uniformly and preventing entanglement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional cable guides are used to compensate cable length, then tensile and compressive forces are reduced, but the device complexity increases and flexibility decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable protectionVSAvoidcable guide complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cable guide is divided into multiple guide ducts arranged next to one another, with each duct handling individual cables. This segmentation allows independent movement of each duct, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining cable protection through distributed force compensation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The guide ducts are designed to be movable relative to one another, allowing dynamic adjustment of cable paths. This dynamic configuration enables the cable guide to adapt to varying tensile and compressive forces without requiring complex fixed structures, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple cables are routed over multiple pivot points, then connectivity is improved, but cable entanglement and obstruction increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable routing flexibilityVSAvoidcable entanglement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Each cable is assigned to its own guide duct, physically separating cable paths. This prevents cables from entangling with one another while still allowing each cable to be routed over multiple pivot points, maintaining connectivity flexibility without the harmful effect of entanglement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The guide ducts act as intermediary structures between cables and pivot points. These ducts guide cables along controlled paths, preventing direct cable-to-cable contact that would cause entanglement, while still enabling versatile routing configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If cables are laid in wave shape for length compensation, then tensile and compressive forces are reduced, but space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable force managementVSAvoidcable guide volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The guide ducts are arranged in a linear sequence next to one another, utilizing a one-dimensional arrangement along the cable path. This linear configuration achieves force management through guided movement rather than requiring the three-dimensional wave shape, thereby reducing the volume occupied by the cable guide while maintaining reliable force management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The cable guide system effectively minimizes cable damage by dynamically adjusting to tensile and compressive forces, maintaining cable separation and preventing entanglement, while optimizing space usage in applications with multiple pivot points.

Implementation Method 1

the two serpentine curve-shaped duct segments are configured so that they are resilient in such a way that they can be compressed toward the fastening structure and expanded away from the fastening structure, counter to a spring force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the two serpentine curve-shaped duct segments are configured so that they are resilient in such a way that they can be compressed toward the fastening structure and expanded away from the fastening structure, counter to a spring force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS11888298B2Cable guide and device
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 DIEBOLD NIXDORF SYST GMBH
  • US11888298B2 patent drawing
  • US11888298B2 patent drawing
  • US11888298B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cable guide having a fastening structure, a plurality of guide ducts, arranged next to one another, which are coupled to one another by the fastening structure and each guide duct of which comprises two serpentine curve-shaped duct segments between which the fastening structure is arranged, wherein the two serpentine curve-shaped duct segments are configured resiliently in such a way that they can be compressed toward the fastening structure and expanded away from the fastening structure counter to a spring force.