Server Cluster Resource Placement Using Constraint Metadata

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The process of determining resource placement in a cloud environment is complicated and error-prone, often requiring extensive testing and modification of source code, and there is a lack of efficient methods to manage and deploy resources without disrupting existing systems.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes constraints as metadata to manage, identify, and filter resources, allowing for efficient deployment by checking resource creation requests against candidate parent resources' constraints and deploying to those that meet the defined criteria, thereby reducing operational burden and improving flexibility and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If shared resources are used for application deployment, then resource utilization and flexibility are improved, but the complexity and error-proneness of determining resource placement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization flexibilityVSAvoidresource placement determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the resource placement determination process into distinct components: constraint definition, constraint validation, and placement execution. By breaking down the complex evaluation process into manageable segments with clear interfaces, the system reduces overall complexity while maintaining flexibility in resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by defining and validating constraints before actual resource placement occurs. The system pre-establishes placement criteria, validates resource compatibility against these constraints beforehand, and only then proceeds with deployment. This preliminary validation approach simplifies the actual placement process and reduces errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If constraint-based resource placement is implemented, then deployment reliability is improved, but the time and computational resources required for evaluation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment reliabilityVSAvoidresource evaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing constraint validation only where necessary - specifically validating against placement constraints before deployment. Rather than performing exhaustive evaluations of all possible placement scenarios, the system focuses validation efforts on critical constraint checks, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing evaluation time and computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through automated constraint validation and placement determination. The deployment system automatically evaluates resources against defined constraints and makes placement decisions without requiring extensive manual testing or intervention. This automation maintains high reliability while significantly reducing the time investment required compared to manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If dedicated resources are assigned to applications, then deployment simplicity is improved, but resource utilization efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment simplicityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universality by creating a constraint-based framework that can handle both dedicated and shared resource scenarios through a unified approach. The same constraint validation mechanism works for both dedicated resource assignment and shared resource evaluation, simplifying the deployment process while enabling efficient resource utilization across different deployment models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes parameter changes by allowing constraint definitions to be adjusted based on deployment requirements. Constraints can be modified to reflect different resource allocation strategies (dedicated vs. shared), enabling the system to optimize resource utilization efficiency while maintaining deployment simplicity through parameter adjustment rather than structural changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12470566B1Constraint-based resource planning for server clusters
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12470566B1 patent drawing
  • US12470566B1 patent drawing
  • US12470566B1 patent drawing

AI summary

When a resource is being deployed to the cloud, there are many possible locations for the deployment. When a resource is created, it is placed under a parent resource. As discussed herein, a system for applying constraints to resources is used. A constraint is a type of metadata that helps manage, identify, organize, and filter resources. Defined constraints are a set of constraints that, for a particular resource, are either set or not set. Custom constraints are key/value pairs that have predefined keys, but variable values. New constraints may be added to the system without modifying source code. When a resource creation request is received, constraints of the resource being created are checked against the constraints of the candidate parent resources. The resource is then deployed to a parent resource for which it does not violate any constraints.