Server Content Weighting Optimization via Statistical Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for managing website content optimization campaigns are subjective, time-consuming, and prone to human error, leading to premature removal of elements and increased costs due to underperforming content, which can result in losses in engagement or revenue.

Innovation Solution

A server-based method that generates and stores multiple website content experiences with adjustable weightings, analyzes user interactions to determine statistical significance, and automatically adjusts weightings to optimize content delivery, minimizing human intervention and optimizing content based on visitor data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual monitoring and optimization of content campaigns is performed, then human control and decision-making are maintained, but the process becomes time-consuming and prone to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service through automated monitoring and optimization algorithms that continuously analyze campaign performance data and adjust content delivery without human intervention. The server automatically identifies underperforming elements and optimizes content allocation based on real-time metrics, eliminating the need for manual monitoring while maintaining or improving decision accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical human monitoring process with an automated computational system. The server uses algorithms to process performance data, calculate optimizations, and implement changes automatically, substituting human manual operations with machine-based automation that operates continuously without time constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual optimization of content elements is performed, then human judgment is applied, but premature removal of elements occurs due to subjective decision-making

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization accuracyVSAvoidcampaign management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where performance data is constantly collected, analyzed, and used to adjust content delivery decisions. The automated monitoring tracks key metrics in real-time and provides feedback to the optimization algorithms, enabling data-driven decisions that eliminate subjective judgment and prevent premature removal of content elements based on insufficient data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of campaign management by transitioning from qualitative human judgment to quantitative automated analysis. The system uses defined performance thresholds, statistical significance levels, and algorithmic decision rules to objectively evaluate content elements, replacing subjective human parameters with measurable, consistent computational criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If extensive manual monitoring is performed, then more control over campaign performance is maintained, but the cost of learning increases due to losses from underperforming content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance controlVSAvoidcost of learning
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively identifying and addressing underperforming content elements before they cause significant losses. The automated monitoring continuously scans performance metrics and triggers optimizations in advance, preventing the accumulation of losses that would occur with reactive manual intervention. This proactive approach reduces the overall cost of learning by minimizing the duration and impact of underperforming content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuous optimization through automated processes that operate without interruption. Unlike manual monitoring which occurs periodically, the automated system continuously analyzes performance data and implements adjustments in real-time, maintaining constant control over campaign performance and eliminating periods where underperforming content could accumulate losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Productivity

If automated content optimization is implemented, then time is saved and human error is reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal optimization system that handles multiple content elements, campaign types, and performance metrics through a single automated platform. The server performs diverse functions including data collection, analysis, decision-making, and implementation across the entire campaign portfolio, consolidating what would otherwise require multiple separate manual processes into one multi-functional automated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11381635B2Method of operating a server apparatus for delivering website content, server apparatus and device in communication with server apparatus
Publication Date: 2022.07.05 MAXYMISER
  • US11381635B2 patent drawing
  • US11381635B2 patent drawing
  • US11381635B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method for delivering content comprising the steps of: (i) generating and storing website content experiences, and storing a respective weighting for each experience; (ii) offering the stored website content experiences based on its weighting, and storing a record of the website content experience offerings; (iii) receiving user-initiated website content actions from the computer devices; (iv) storing the user-initiated website content actions from the computer devices in relation to the website content experience offered; (v) analysing the user-initiated website content actions in relation to the record of website content experience offerings to determine a frequency of website content experience actions in relation to a frequency of website content experience offerings, and (vi) adjusting the stored weighting of a website content experience in response to the determined frequency of website content experience actions in relation to the frequency of website content experience offerings satisfying a criterion and an associated statistical significance criterion.