Server Grid Condition Sensor for Failure Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Grid outages and fluctuations are difficult to predict, making it challenging for electrical utilities and server installations to take preemptive measures to mitigate disruptions, as demand for power does not always align with the availability of renewable energy sources, leading to potential disruptions and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system with a grid analysis module and an action causing module that utilize grid condition signals from server installations to predict future failures, allowing for adjustments in energy storage, generator states, and workload scheduling to mitigate potential outages by analyzing historical and real-time data across interconnected grids.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If grid condition monitoring is expanded across multiple server installations, then prediction accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrid failure prediction accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal prediction framework that can process grid condition signals from multiple different server installations and grid locations through a single machine learning model. This multi-functional approach allows the system to learn from diverse data sources and improve prediction accuracy across the entire grid infrastructure without requiring separate complex systems for each installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges grid condition monitoring and prediction capabilities across multiple server installations into a centralized machine learning model. By combining data from multiple sources and processing it through a unified prediction engine, the system achieves higher prediction accuracy while avoiding the complexity of multiple independent monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Loss of time

If real-time grid condition signals are continuously analyzed, then failure prediction timeliness improves, but computational energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction lead timeVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic analysis of grid condition signals at optimized intervals rather than continuous real-time processing. The machine learning model is trained to make accurate predictions based on periodic updates of grid conditions, reducing computational energy consumption while maintaining sufficient prediction lead time for proactive power source switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial processing by focusing computational resources on analyzing only the most critical grid condition parameters that have the highest predictive value for grid failures. This selective analysis approach reduces overall computational energy consumption while maintaining effective prediction capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9933804B2Server installation as a grid condition sensor
Publication Date: 2018.04.03 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US9933804B2 patent drawing
  • US9933804B2 patent drawing
  • US9933804B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This document relates to analyzing electrical grid conditions using server installations. One example obtains first grid condition signals describing first grid conditions detected by a first server installation during a first time period. The first server installation is connected to a first electrical grid and first previous grid failure events have occurred on the first electrical grid during the first time period. The example also obtains second grid condition signals describing second grid conditions detected by a second server installation during a second time period. The second server installation is connected to a second electrical grid that is geographically remote from the first electrical grid and second previous grid failure events have occurred on the second electrical grid during the second time period. The example also includes using the first grid condition signals and the second grid condition signals to predict a future grid failure event on the second electrical grid.