Server Takeover via Virtual Hardware Configuration Matching
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing server systems face inefficiencies in hardware resource utilization and take-over processes when dealing with different hardware configurations, leading to potential failures in OS startup and licensing constraints, especially when trying to switch operations from a physical server to another with varying configurations.
Innovation Solution
A server system with a local management computer that compares and matches hardware configurations between current and backup servers, determining the possibility of take-over and allocating backup servers based on configuration matching rates and concealment policies to efficiently utilize hardware resources.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If server take-over is performed by matching physical hardware configurations, then take-over reliability is improved, but hardware resource utilization efficiency deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The invention creates a virtual hardware configuration copy that mirrors the original server's hardware setup. This virtual configuration is presented to the operating system during take-over, allowing the OS to operate as if on the original hardware while the physical underlying hardware can differ. This resolves the contradiction by decoupling OS requirements from physical hardware constraints.
Solution Approach 2:
The invention introduces a virtualization layer as an intermediary between the physical hardware and the operating system. This layer abstracts the hardware differences and presents a unified, matched configuration to the OS, enabling take-over across different physical hardware while maintaining compatibility. The intermediary handles the translation and adaptation needed to resolve the contradiction.
2Adaptability or versatility
If server take-over is performed by concealing hardware configuration differences, then adaptability is improved, but hardware resource utilization efficiency deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The invention creates a virtual hardware configuration copy that mirrors the original server's hardware setup. This virtual configuration is presented to the operating system during take-over, allowing the OS to operate as if on the original hardware while the physical underlying hardware can differ. This resolves the contradiction by decoupling OS requirements from physical hardware constraints.
Solution Approach 2:
The invention dynamically changes the hardware configuration parameters presented to the operating system based on the take-over scenario. By modifying which hardware parameters are exposed and how they are presented, the system achieves adaptability to different physical configurations while optimizing resource utilization through intelligent parameter selection and management.
3Ease of operation
If simple configuration matching is performed for take-over, then ease of operation is improved, but hardware resource utilization efficiency deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The invention performs preliminary configuration matching and virtual hardware setup before the actual take-over occurs. By pre-configuring the virtual hardware environment and matching parameters in advance, the actual take-over operation becomes simple and straightforward, while the system simultaneously optimizes hardware resource allocation through the pre-established virtualization framework.
Solution Approach 2:
The invention creates a virtual hardware configuration copy that mirrors the original server's hardware setup. This virtual configuration is presented to the operating system during take-over, allowing the OS to operate as if on the original hardware while the physical underlying hardware can differ. This resolves the contradiction by decoupling OS requirements from physical hardware constraints.
Data Source
AI summary
In a server system, a hardware configuration comparison is made with respect to each combination of a current server and a backup server, and, by referring to hardware configuration matching policy information, the presence or absence of hardware configuration concealment and the possibility of a take-over are determined with respect to each combination of the current server and the backup server. In addition, with respect to each combination of the current server and the backup server, a configuration matching rate indicating the ratio of hardware configuration matching is calculated. Based on information about the presence or absence of hardware configuration concealment, information about the possibility of a take-over, and information about the configuration matching rate with respect to each combination of the current server and the backup server, the backup server as a take-over destination of the current server is allocated.


