Service-Based Core Network Architecture for 4G to 5G Aerial Handover

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current communication networks face challenges in efficiently managing and optimizing the interaction between wireless devices and base stations, particularly in supporting multiple technologies and releases, and ensuring seamless service provision across different network slices.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a service-based architecture within the core network, which enables network functions to offer services to each other and to other elements of the communication network via interfaces, facilitating dynamic service discovery and management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a traditional monolithic core network architecture is used, then network stability is maintained, but flexibility and scalability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidnetwork architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The core network is divided into multiple independent network functions (NFs) that can be individually deployed, managed, and scaled. Each NF performs a specific function (e.g., authentication, routing, billing) and communicates through standardized interfaces, enabling flexible reconfiguration and adaptation to different service requirements without redesigning the entire network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The service-based architecture implements universal service interfaces that allow different network functions to interact through common protocols and data models. This enables a single NF to serve multiple purposes and allows services to be composed from different NFs in various combinations, enhancing versatility while maintaining architectural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple wireless technologies and releases are supported, then device compatibility is improved, but network management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetechnology compatibilityVSAvoidnetwork management ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The architecture implements universal service interfaces and common data models that work across different wireless technologies (5G, 4G, Wi-Fi) and releases. Network functions communicate through technology-agnostic interfaces, allowing the same core network infrastructure to support multiple access technologies and device types without requiring technology-specific management procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The service-based architecture introduces intermediary service interfaces and abstraction layers that translate between different technology-specific protocols and the unified core network functions. This mediator layer handles the complexity of multi-technology support while presenting a simplified management interface to operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If network slicing is implemented, then service differentiation is improved, but service discovery and management difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice differentiationVSAvoidservice discovery difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The architecture implements feedback mechanisms where network functions publish their available services and capabilities through standardized service registries. Other network functions and service management systems can query these registries to discover available services, and the system provides feedback on service status, capacity, and performance metrics to enable dynamic service composition and slicing management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Network functions automatically register their services, capabilities, and interfaces with the service management system without manual configuration. The architecture enables self-discovery where network functions autonomously identify and compose services from available NFs, reducing the burden on operators for service discovery and management while maintaining detailed service differentiation for various network slices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250128835A1Aerial Service
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 PENINSULA TECH LLC
  • US20250128835A1 patent drawing
  • US20250128835A1 patent drawing
  • US20250128835A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A mobility management entity (MME) receives, from a first base station of a fourth generation (4G) network, a handover request for a handover of a wireless device to a second base station of a fifth generation (5G) network. The MME selects a session management controller supporting an aerial service and interworking between the 4G network and the 5G network. The MME receives, from the session management controller, a message indicating a creation of a session of the wireless device with the second base station of the 5G network. The message comprises an indication of an authentication and/or authorization (AA) status of the aerial service of the wireless device. Based on the handover request, the MME sends, to an access and mobility management function (AMF) of the 5G network, the indication of the AA status of the aerial service of the wireless device.