Service Convergence Fabric for Multi-Network Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing networks operate independently, limiting the ability of applications to extend their reach across multiple networks, requiring significant customization and failing to leverage network resources effectively, which hinders seamless service delivery and management across different administrative domains.

Innovation Solution

A service convergence fabric is introduced between independent access networks, control networks, and service networks, processing service requests to facilitate seamless service delivery by integrating user, network, and resource information, enabling dynamic selection and use of network resources, and providing a converged response across multiple networks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If networks operate independently, then network operational independence and administrative autonomy are maintained, but application reach across multiple networks is limited and service integration is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication reachVSAvoidnetwork integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The service convergence fabric acts as an intermediary layer between independent networks and applications. It provides standardized interfaces and protocols that enable applications to access multiple networks without requiring custom integration for each network, thus extending application reach while maintaining network independence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The service convergence fabric implements universal service access mechanisms that work across different network types (access networks, control networks, service networks). This multi-functional approach allows a single fabric architecture to handle diverse service requirements without requiring network-specific customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If applications are customized for each network, then service delivery on individual networks is optimized, but the effort and complexity required to support multiple networks increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice delivery efficiencyVSAvoidcustomization effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The architecture segments the system into three distinct layers: independent networks, service convergence fabric, and applications. This segmentation allows each layer to operate independently with standardized interfaces, eliminating the need for applications to be customized for each network while maintaining optimized service delivery through the fabric's coordination capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The service convergence fabric serves as a mediator that handles network-specific protocols and translations, allowing applications to interact with multiple networks through a unified interface. This eliminates customization efforts while maintaining efficient service delivery through the fabric's intelligent routing and resource management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If networks operate independently, then administrative autonomy is maintained, but resource leveraging across networks is ineffective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource leveragingVSAvoidadministrative complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The service convergence fabric acts as an intermediary that enables resource sharing and coordination across independent networks without compromising administrative autonomy. It provides mechanisms for resource discovery, allocation, and management that allow networks to leverage each other's resources while maintaining their own administrative control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If service integration is implemented, then seamless service delivery across networks is achieved, but operational independence of individual networks is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice integrationVSAvoidoperational independence
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The architecture maintains clear segmentation between networks and the service convergence fabric. Networks remain operationally independent while the fabric provides integration services, ensuring that service integration does not compromise network autonomy. Each network can be managed independently while still participating in integrated services through the fabric.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8248965B2Method and apparatus regarding use of a service convergence fabric
Publication Date: 2012.08.21 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC
  • US8248965B2 patent drawing
  • US8248965B2 patent drawing
  • US8248965B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A service convergence fabric (103) is operably disposed between a plurality of independent access networks, control networks, and service networks (104) and a converged application layer (100). This service convergence fabric is then used (202) to receive a service request, process the service request, provide a corresponding response, and publish that response to facilitate the service request. Processing the service request can comprise processing the service request with respect to resources to support the service request, user session status as corresponds to the service request, and user preferences as correspond to the service request. Providing a response can comprise providing a response that comprises at least one of a processed service request and a converged response to the service request.