Service Request Decision Layer for Credible AI Execution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The inaccuracy in AI model predictions leads to faulty service decisions and executions, necessitating improved credibility in service decision-making.

Innovation Solution

A service execution system that evaluates both AI models and policies based on collected service requests to select the decision manner with the best evaluation result, ensuring accurate processing of future requests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If an AI model is used to perform service decision, then service automation is improved, but prediction accuracy deteriorates leading to faulty service execution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice automationVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a decision apparatus as an intermediary between the AI model and service execution. This apparatus evaluates both the AI model's predictions and alternative policies, selecting the optimal decision based on comparative assessment. The decision apparatus acts as a mediator that resolves the conflict between automated AI-driven decisions and reliable accurate execution by introducing a verification and selection layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the decision apparatus continuously evaluates the AI model's performance against alternative policies using collected service request data. This feedback loop allows the system to identify when the AI model's predictions become unreliable and switch to alternative decision-making approaches, thereby maintaining high prediction accuracy while preserving automation benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If AI model prediction is used for service decision, then processing speed is improved, but decision credibility deteriorates due to inaccurate predictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiddecision credibility
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of multiple decision-making approaches (AI model predictions versus alternative policies) before final service execution. The decision apparatus pre-assesses the credibility of AI model predictions by comparing them with alternative policies using historical data, and only selects the AI model's prediction when it demonstrates superior credibility. This preliminary verification maintains processing speed while ensuring decision credibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If only AI model is used for service decision, then system complexity is reduced, but service execution reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidservice execution reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The decision apparatus serves multiple functions: it collects service request data, evaluates AI model predictions, assesses alternative policies, compares their performances, and selects the optimal decision. This multi-functional component adds complexity but enables the system to maintain reliability by providing comprehensive evaluation and selection capabilities that a simple AI model alone cannot provide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12488376B2Service execution system and related product
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 HUAWEI CLOUD COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD
  • US12488376B2 patent drawing
  • US12488376B2 patent drawing
  • US12488376B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A service execution system includes a service execution apparatus and a decision apparatus. The service execution apparatus collects a first quantity of service requests from a received service request to obtain a first sample set, and sends the first sample set to the decision apparatus. The decision apparatus evaluates a first model and a first policy based on the first sample set, then the decision apparatus processes following steps based on an evaluation result of the first model.