Business Service Evaluation Tool for ROI Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Businesses face difficulty in determining which software-related support services to implement effectively to maximize the effectiveness and savings from business applications, suites, portals, and platforms due to the numerous support services available.

Innovation Solution

A tool that evaluates support services by correlating them with factors defining a business environment, prompting users for input on business issues and objectives, calculating relevancy scores, and recommending services based on user-identified needs, while also computing potential savings associated with service implementation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If businesses implement multiple support services to maximize effectiveness of business applications, then the return on investment is improved, but the difficulty in determining which services to implement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereturn on investmentVSAvoidservice selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically evaluates and recommends support services by correlating them with business environment factors, eliminating the need for manual analysis of numerous services. The tool performs self-directed service selection based on automated relevancy scoring, reducing the complexity burden on businesses while maintaining high ROI through data-driven recommendations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation tool acts as an intermediary between the vast array of available support services and business decision-makers. It translates complex service portfolios into simplified, prioritized recommendations by calculating relevancy scores and correlating services with specific business factors, thereby reducing selection complexity while optimizing investment returns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If a comprehensive array of support services is made available, then the potential savings from business applications increase, but the difficulty in identifying relevant services increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepotential savingsVSAvoidservice relevancy identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual service identification processes with automated computational methods. Instead of relying on human analysis to detect relevant services among numerous options, the tool uses algorithmic relevancy scoring and correlation analysis to automatically identify and rank services that will maximize savings from business applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms by continuously correlating service performance data with business outcomes. It measures the actual impact of implemented services and uses this feedback to refine future recommendations, thereby improving the accuracy of identifying relevant services that generate savings while reducing the difficulty of detection through learned patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8615399B2Tool for evaluation of business services
Publication Date: 2013.12.24 SAP SE
  • US8615399B2 patent drawing
  • US8615399B2 patent drawing
  • US8615399B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tool for evaluating support services may correlate those services with an array of factors that define a business environment and then identify the business services that are most directly correlated to those factors. In exemplary embodiments, a tool may prompt a user for input concerning business issues and objectives; correlate those issues and objectives to a plurality of available software support services such as maintenance, optimization, architecture planning, implementation, administration and systems integration services; select the services that most directly address the particular needs and objectives identified by the user; and calculate a return on investment (ROI) associated with satisfaction of identified business objectives through implementation of the selected support services.