Service Panel Microprocessor Utility Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for controlling utility services in school science classrooms are inefficient, posing safety hazards and allowing unauthorized access, with remote control systems being difficult to access and manage, especially in emergencies, and lacking integration with building automation systems.

Innovation Solution

A service panel with a utility controller that uses a microprocessor for centralized control, allowing safe operation and remote activation/deactivation of services, integrating with building automation systems, and featuring a panic button for emergency shutdown, while ensuring secure access and monitoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If remote control switches are used to control utility services, then unauthorized access is prevented, but access during emergencies becomes difficult and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice control safetyVSAvoidemergency access speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The service panel is segmented into two distinct access mechanisms: a keyed switch for normal operation and a panic button for emergencies. This segmentation allows each mechanism to be optimized for its specific purpose without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The panic button acts as an intermediary emergency access mechanism that bypasses the normal keyed switch requirement. It provides a direct path to shut off services during emergencies without requiring key access or locating remote switches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If solenoid valves are remotely located away from control switches, then service isolation is improved, but wiring complexity and installation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice isolation effectivenessVSAvoidwiring and installation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control switch, solenoid valve, and service panel are merged into a single integrated unit. This eliminates the need for separate wiring between remotely located components and simplifies installation while maintaining effective service isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The service panel is designed as a multi-functional universal unit that combines control switching, solenoid actuation, and service isolation in one location, reducing the need for separate components and complex interconnections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If conventional control switches are used, then service control is achieved, but integration with building automation systems is lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice control capabilityVSAvoidbuilding automation integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control switch is designed to perform multiple functions: local manual control and integration with building automation systems. This multi-functionality allows the same component to serve both standalone and networked operational modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control switch serves as an intermediary between local user action and building automation system control. It can receive signals from either the user directly or from the building automation network, providing flexible integration capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If monitoring capabilities are added to service panels, then safety and management are enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice monitoring capabilityVSAvoidpanel system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Monitoring capabilities are merged with the existing control functions in the service panel. The same microprocessor and communication interfaces used for control are also utilized for monitoring, eliminating the need for separate dedicated monitoring hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The microprocessor and communication system in the service panel are designed to perform multiple functions including control, monitoring, diagnostics, and building automation integration, reducing the need for separate dedicated components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8543225B2Service panel with microprocessor
Publication Date: 2013.09.24 ISIMET MAPA LLC
  • US8543225B2 patent drawing
  • US8543225B2 patent drawing
  • US8543225B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A service panel for limiting access to authorized persons. A sub-region of the service panel controls at least one electrically-operated (e.g., solenoid-operated) valve that is connected to service utilities (e.g., water or gas) piping so as to control flow through the valve. According to one embodiment, another sub-region (i.e., a utility controller region) contains a PCB and other electrical controls for controlling the valve(s) and communicating with other services such as a remote transmitter, or an auxiliary monitoring system (e.g., a fire alarm system). The service panel facilitates the use of advantageous features including: emergency shutdown by anyone while permitting reset only by authorized personnel; modular construction so as to facilitate installation of the system. Various jumper terminals and connecting wires provide for programming of the system to accommodate a variety of applications.