Service Procurement System Vendor Matching Bidding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wedding planning and other event service procurement is time-consuming and inefficient due to the need for brides to meet with multiple vendors, evaluate numerous price quotes, and determine reasonable pricing, leading to potential overpayment or unmet needs.

Innovation Solution

A service procurement system that generates service request vendor attribute content based on vendor information and customer inquiries, determines qualified vendors, requests bids from them, and broadcasts bid amounts to customers, facilitating a transparent bidding process and efficient service procurement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a bride meets with multiple vendors to discuss pricing and service details, then the likelihood of finding a suitable vendor increases, but the time and effort required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevendor selection qualityVSAvoidvendor evaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an online platform as an intermediary between customers and vendors. The platform pre-qualifies vendors based on service area, availability, and pricing criteria, then presents a curated list to customers. This eliminates the need for customers to manually contact and evaluate numerous vendors, significantly reducing time while maintaining selection quality through systematic pre-screening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary vendor qualification and screening before customers begin their search. Vendors are pre-evaluated against service area coverage, availability during desired time periods, and pricing合理性. This preliminary action filters out unsuitable vendors in advance, allowing customers to focus only on qualified options and reducing overall evaluation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If a bride evaluates thirty or more vendors for an event, then the chance of finding the perfect vendor increases, but the complexity of the procurement process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevendor selection qualityVSAvoidprocurement process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the vendor evaluation process into distinct phases: (1) customer defines service requirements and criteria, (2) system pre-qualifies vendors based on those criteria, (3) system presents curated list of qualified vendors, (4) customer evaluates and selects from pre-screened options. This segmentation transforms a monolithic complex process into manageable stages, reducing perceived complexity while maintaining thorough evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The online platform acts as a mediator that handles the complex tasks of vendor screening, qualification, and matching. It automatically compares vendor capabilities against customer requirements, filters out incompatible options, and presents only relevant matches. This intermediary absorbs the computational complexity of evaluating dozens of vendors, leaving the customer with a simplified decision-making process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If a bride reviews price quotes from multiple vendors, then pricing transparency improves, but the time required to determine reasonable pricing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepricing information transparencyVSAvoidpricing evaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where vendors respond to customer inquiries with standardized price quotes that include detailed service descriptions. The platform then provides comparative feedback, showing customers how different vendors' prices compare relative to market averages and service quality metrics. This structured feedback enables rapid pricing evaluation without requiring customers to manually analyze each quote in detail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The platform provides universal pricing comparison tools that work across all vendor types and service categories. It standardizes price quote formats, automatically adjusts for service area differences, and provides normalized comparisons that account for varying service scopes. This multi-functional pricing analysis tool handles diverse pricing structures uniformly, enabling fast and accurate pricing evaluation across all vendors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If a bride lacks knowledge about vendor service requirements and reasonable pricing, then vendor selection becomes more difficult, but the risk of overpayment or unmet needs increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevendor selection flexibilityVSAvoidservice requirement fulfillment
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system empowers customers with self-service educational resources that explain service requirements, industry standards, and pricing benchmarks for different vendor types. Interactive tools guide customers through defining their needs, and the system automatically matches these requirements against vendor capabilities. This self-service approach educates customers while ensuring their requirements are properly articulated and matched to appropriate vendors, reducing both difficulty and risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10614496B2Service procurement system
Publication Date: 2020.04.07 MOHAN SELVA P
  • US10614496B2 patent drawing
  • US10614496B2 patent drawing
  • US10614496B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented service procurement method that includes generating service request vendor attribute content in response to a new service request inquiry from a customer device that is associated with a customer. The service request vendor attribute content is based at least in part on a comparison of vendor attribute information for one or more vendor types and information included with the new service request inquiry. Content is generated for the customer device that includes the service request vendor attribute content. The method includes determining qualified vendor content in response to a service request from the customer device, wherein one or more qualified vendors for the qualified vendor content are determined, at least in part, by comparing vendor profile information for one or more vendors with information included with the service request. The method includes requesting bids for the service request from the one or more qualified vendors by generating content for one or more qualified vendor devices that are associated with the one or more qualified vendors, wherein the content includes the service request, and wherein content is generated for the customer device that includes the qualified vendor content. The method includes, in response to the requesting bids for the service request, receiving a bid amount from at least one of the one or more qualified vendor devices and generating the content for at least some of the one or more qualified vendor devices that includes the bid amount.