Service Provider Comparison System for Cost Estimate Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Individuals face challenges in comparing and selecting service providers due to lack of accurate cost estimates and inefficient payment processes, particularly in service-related fields like healthcare and home improvement, where 'projected costs' often lead to manual and time-consuming payment methods.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilizes a service provider application on user devices to gather and record experiences, provide comparative data on service providers, and facilitate transactions by processing intermediate payments on behalf of users based on historical data, allowing users to pre-authorize payments and avoid subsequent billing discrepancies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If individuals receive projected costs from service providers, then they can estimate service expenses, but the costs are often inaccurate leading to billing discrepancies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost estimate accuracyVSAvoidactual cost information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by gathering historical data from multiple sources (insurance companies, service providers, other users) before the actual service transaction occurs. This allows the system to provide more accurate cost estimates upfront, reducing billing discrepancies. The application pre-calculates expected out-of-pocket expenses based on historical patterns rather than relying solely on service provider projections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously collecting actual cost data from users after service transactions and using this information to refine future cost estimates. The application learns from historical data and adjusts its pricing models based on real-world outcomes, improving accuracy over time. This feedback loop addresses the inaccuracy of initial projected costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If users manually process payments through checks, mail, or telephone, then they can pay service providers, but the process is time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment processing efficiencyVSAvoidpayment processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system acts as an intermediary between users and service providers, automating the payment process. The application handles payment processing electronically through integrated systems, eliminating the need for manual checks, mail, or telephone payments. This intermediary role streamlines the transaction and significantly reduces processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical payment processes (writing checks, mailing payments, making telephone calls) with automated electronic payment processing. The application integrates with payment systems to automatically charge users' accounts and transfer funds to service providers, substituting the mechanical manual process with an automated digital system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If users lack comparative data on service providers, then they can simplify their decision process, but they cannot compare prices or quality of different providers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice provider selectionVSAvoidcomparative service data
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The application provides multiple functions in one system: it gathers cost data, quality information, user reviews, and service provider comparisons all in a single platform. The system universally collects and presents various types of service provider information (prices, quality metrics, insurance acceptance) that users need to make informed decisions, eliminating the need to search multiple sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments service provider information into distinct, comparable categories such as cost estimates, quality ratings, user reviews, and service details. This segmentation allows users to easily compare different providers across multiple dimensions without being overwhelmed by unstructured information. Each service provider is evaluated and presented with broken-down metrics for systematic comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10043206B2Facilitating transactions in connection with service providers
Publication Date: 2018.08.07 PAYPAL INC

AI summary

A system according to an embodiment comprises one or more processors; and one or more memories adapted to store a plurality of machine-readable instructions which when executed by the processor(s) are adapted to cause the system to: receive, from a user device of a user, user input search information in connection with one or more desired items of interest to the user; determine one or more service providers or entities offering the one or more desired items based on a location of the user device; and generate comparative data for the one or more service providers or entities that provide the desired item(s) based on historical data of the one or more service providers or entities and the received user input search information.