Service Provider Matching via Metadata Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Online publishing service platforms face challenges in identifying the most suitable service providers for creative works as the number of authors and service providers increases, making it difficult for rights holders to find the best match for their services.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing metadata and attribute information to recommend service providers or creative works by comparing user profiles and service requests, allowing for filtering, sorting, and ranking based on relevance, and enabling fuzzy matching to broaden or narrow the search results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If more service providers are added to the platform, then the variety and availability of services improve, but the difficulty of determining the best-suited service provider increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice varietyVSAvoidmatching difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the matching process from a manual, qualitative assessment to an automated, quantitative comparison by changing parameters such as service categories, skill tags, availability windows, and client requirements into structured data fields that can be systematically evaluated and ranked

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The platform introduces an automated matching system as an intermediary between service providers and clients, using algorithms to compare service provider attributes with client requirements and generate ranked recommendations, thereby resolving the information asymmetry and complexity in the matching process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If manual matching methods are used, then the matching process is simple to implement, but the time and effort required to find suitable service providers increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidmatching time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-matching where service providers and clients input their requirements and preferences, and the platform automatically generates matching recommendations without requiring manual intervention from platform operators, significantly reducing matching time while maintaining scalability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Service providers pre-register their service offerings, skills, availability, and other attributes in advance, allowing the system to perform rapid matching when clients submit requests, eliminating the need for real-time manual screening and reducing overall matching time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10068267B1Programmatic selection of service provider
Publication Date: 2018.09.04 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10068267B1 patent drawing
  • US10068267B1 patent drawing
  • US10068267B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer-readable media are disclosed for determining a recommendation for a service provider to perform a service on a creative work based on metadata associated with the creative work and attribute information associated with the service provider. Systems, methods, and computer-readable media are also disclosed for determining a recommendation for a creative work requiring a service to be performed based on metadata associated with the creative work and attribute information associated with the service provider.